Suppr超能文献

小脑异质性及其对5-羟色胺受体放射性配体PET数据定量的影响。

Cerebellar heterogeneity and its impact on PET data quantification of 5-HT receptor radioligands.

作者信息

Ganz Melanie, Feng Ling, Hansen Hanne Demant, Beliveau Vincent, Svarer Claus, Knudsen Gitte M, Greve Douglas N

机构信息

1 Neurobiology Research Unit and Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

2 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Sep;37(9):3243-3252. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16686092. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Abstract

In the quantification of positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer binding, a commonly used method is reference tissue modeling (RTM). RTM necessitates a proper reference and a ubiquitous choice for G-protein coupled receptors is the cerebellum. We investigated regional differences in uptake within the grey matter of the cerebellar hemispheres (CH), the cerebellar white matter (CW), and the cerebellar vermis (CV) for five PET radioligands targeting the serotonin system. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of choosing different reference regions when quantifying neocortical binding. The PET and MR images are part of the Cimbi database: 5-HTR ([C]CUMI-101, n = 8), 5-HTR ([C]AZ10419369, n = 36), 5-HTR ([C]Cimbi-36, n = 29), 5-HTR ([C]SB207145, n = 59), and 5-HTT ([C]DASB, n = 100). We employed SUIT and FreeSurfer to delineate CV, CW, and CH and quantified mean standardized uptake values (SUV) and nondisplaceable neocortical binding potential (BP). Statistical difference was assessed with paired nonparametric two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and multiple comparison corrected via false discovery rate. We demonstrate significant radioligand specific regional differences in cerebellar uptake. These differences persist when using different cerebellar regions for RTM, but the influence on the neocortical BP is small. Nevertheless, our data highlight the importance of validating each radioligand carefully for defining the optimal reference region.

摘要

在正电子发射断层扫描(PET)放射性示踪剂结合的定量分析中,一种常用的方法是参考组织建模(RTM)。RTM需要一个合适的参考区域,而对于G蛋白偶联受体来说,一个普遍的选择是小脑。我们研究了针对5-羟色胺系统的五种PET放射性配体在小脑半球灰质(CH)、小脑白质(CW)和小脑蚓部(CV)内摄取的区域差异。此外,我们评估了在定量新皮质结合时选择不同参考区域的影响。PET和MR图像是Cimbi数据库的一部分:5-羟色胺受体1([C]CUMI-101,n = 8)、5-羟色胺受体2A([C]AZ10419369,n = 36)、5-羟色胺受体2C([C]Cimbi-36,n = 29)、5-羟色胺受体6([C]SB207145,n = 59)和5-羟色胺转运体([C]DASB,n = 100)。我们使用SUIT和FreeSurfer来勾勒CV、CW和CH,并定量平均标准化摄取值(SUV)和不可置换的新皮质结合潜能(BP)。通过配对非参数双侧Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估统计差异,并通过错误发现率进行多重比较校正。我们证明了放射性配体在小脑摄取方面存在显著的区域特异性差异。当使用不同的小脑区域进行RTM时,这些差异仍然存在,但对新皮质BP的影响较小。尽管如此,我们的数据强调了仔细验证每种放射性配体以确定最佳参考区域的重要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
The Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging (Cimbi) database.综合分子脑成像中心(Cimbi)数据库。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt B):1213-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
FreeSurfer.FreeSurfer。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验