• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性乳腺癌治疗后的影像监测

Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.

作者信息

Lam Diana L, Houssami Nehmat, Lee Janie M

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave East, G2-600, Seattle, WA 98109-1023.

2 Screening and Test Evaluation Program, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):676-686. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16300. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.16.16300
PMID:28075622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5458742/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current clinical guidelines are consistent in supporting annual mammography for women after treatment of primary breast cancer. Surveillance imaging beyond standard digital mammography, including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), breast ultrasound, and MRI, may improve outcomes. This article reviews the evidence on the performance and effectiveness of breast imaging modalities available for surveillance after treatment of sporadic unilateral primary breast cancer and identifies additional factors to be considered when selecting an imaging surveillance regimen.

CONCLUSION

Evidence review supports the use of mammography for surveillance after primary breast cancer treatment. Variability exists in guideline recommendations for surveillance initiation, interval, and cessation. DBT offers the most promise as a potential modality to replace standard digital mammography as a front-line surveillance test; a single published study to date has shown a significant decrease in recall rates compared with standard digital mammography alone. Most guidelines do not support the use of whole-breast ultrasound in breast cancer surveillance, and further studies are needed to define the characteristics of women who may benefit from MRI surveillance. The emerging evidence about surveillance imaging outcomes suggests that additional factors, including patient and imaging characteristics, tumor biology and gene expression profile, and choice of treatment, warrant consideration in selecting personalized posttreatment imaging surveillance regimens.

摘要

目的

当前临床指南一致支持对原发性乳腺癌治疗后的女性进行年度乳腺钼靶检查。除标准数字乳腺钼靶检查外的监测成像,包括数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)、乳腺超声和MRI,可能会改善治疗效果。本文回顾了散发性单侧原发性乳腺癌治疗后可用于监测的乳腺成像模式的性能和有效性的证据,并确定了选择成像监测方案时需考虑的其他因素。

结论

证据审查支持在原发性乳腺癌治疗后使用乳腺钼靶进行监测。在监测开始、间隔和停止的指南建议方面存在差异。DBT作为一种潜在的模式最有希望取代标准数字乳腺钼靶作为一线监测检查;迄今为止一项已发表的研究表明,与单独使用标准数字乳腺钼靶相比,召回率显著降低。大多数指南不支持在乳腺癌监测中使用全乳超声,需要进一步研究来确定可能从MRI监测中获益的女性特征。关于监测成像结果的新证据表明,在选择个性化的治疗后成像监测方案时,包括患者和成像特征、肿瘤生物学和基因表达谱以及治疗选择等其他因素值得考虑。

相似文献

1
Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.原发性乳腺癌治疗后的影像监测
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):676-686. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16300. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.致密型乳腺人群乳腺癌筛查中补充性筛查作为乳腺 X 线摄影的辅助手段:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023.
3
Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与数字乳腺断层合成技术对乳腺癌幸存者的影像学监测比较。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):308-316. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201854. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.不同原发性乳腺癌治疗后监测性乳房 X 光造影方案的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价注册库分析和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(34):v-vi, 1-322. doi: 10.3310/hta15340.
5
Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.2007-2016 年有乳腺癌个人病史女性的数字乳腺 X 线摄影与乳腺断层合成性能
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):290-300. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204581. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density.基于乳腺密度的乳腺 X 线摄影、数字乳腺断层合成和磁共振成像在乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4224.
7
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.已知患有乳腺癌的女性中,数字乳腺断层合成以及数字乳腺钼靶联合磁共振成像的诊断性能比较。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1556-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3998-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
8
Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与数字乳腺 X 线摄影加断层合成在乳腺癌筛查中的比较:奥斯陆断层合成筛查试验。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):23-30. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182394. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.针对乳腺癌平均风险女性进行数字化乳腺钼靶筛查,针对高风险女性进行磁共振成像(MRI)筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(3):1-55. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
10
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.数字乳腺断层合成联合乳腺X线摄影、磁共振成像联合乳腺X线摄影及单纯乳腺X线摄影:有症状女性诊断性能的比较
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;66(2):105-116. doi: 10.3233/CH-16242.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of mammographic breast density on locoregional recurrence in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺钼靶密度对乳腺癌局部区域复发的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07804-5.
2
ESR Essentials: post-treatment breast cancer surveillance from mammography to a more personalised approach-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.红细胞沉降率要点:乳腺癌治疗后监测——从乳腺摄影到更个性化的方法——欧洲乳腺影像学会的实践建议
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11819-3.
3
Surveillance Outcomes by Imaging Methods in the First 5 Years After Breast Cancer Surgery.乳腺癌手术后前5年通过影像学方法的监测结果
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Jun;26(6):532-545. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1101. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
4
Comparison of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT, MRI, and mammography for breast cancer characterization.对比增强锥形束乳腺CT、MRI和乳腺钼靶摄影对乳腺癌特征的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11568-3.
5
Contrast-enhanced mammography for surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer.对比增强乳腺摄影用于有乳腺癌个人史女性的监测。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07419-2. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate.MR 对比增强乳腺摄影(CEM)用于乳腺癌患者随访:利弊之争。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6264-6270. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10684-w. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
False negative breast cancers on imaging and associated risk factors: a single institution six-year analysis.影像学假阴性乳腺癌及其相关危险因素:单中心六年分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jun;205(3):507-520. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07259-0. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Correlation between variant allele frequency and mean tumor molecules with tumor burden in patients with solid tumors.实体瘤患者变异等位基因频率与肿瘤负荷相关的平均肿瘤分子。
Mol Oncol. 2024 Nov;18(11):2649-2657. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13557. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
9
Contrast enhanced mammography in breast cancer surveillance.乳腺癌监测中的对比增强乳腺摄影。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):221-230. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06916-0. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
10
Mammographic calcifications undergoing percutaneous biopsy: outcome in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer.经皮穿刺活检的乳腺钙化:有和无乳腺癌个人史女性的结果。
Radiol Med. 2023 Feb;128(2):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01583-5. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.与单纯二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)相比,采用获得性或合成二维钼靶(2D 钼靶)的断层合成乳腺 X 线摄影术(3D 乳腺 X 线摄影术)进行乳腺癌筛查(STORM-2):一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1105-1113. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
A prospective study comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography in surveillance after breast cancer treatment.一项前瞻性研究比较了乳腺癌治疗后监测中数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺 X 线摄影的效果。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 7.
3
Melanoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.黑色素瘤临床实践指南(2016 年版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Apr;14(4):450-73. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0051.
4
Adjunct Screening With Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in Women With Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Trial.乳腺钼靶检查阴性的致密型乳腺女性采用断层合成或超声进行辅助筛查:一项前瞻性比较试验的中期报告
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1882-1888. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4147. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的有效性比较:3 年乳腺癌筛查的结果分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):737-43. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536.
6
The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.国家乳腺X线摄影数据库:初步数据。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):883-90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14312. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.对有乳腺癌个人病史的女性进行 MRI 筛查。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jan 7;108(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv349. Print 2016 Mar.
9
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.美国癌症协会/美国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌生存者护理指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):611-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3809. Epub 2015 Dec 7.