García-González Elena, Aramendía Maite, González-Tarancón Ricardo, Romero-Sánchez Naiara, Rello Luis
.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jul 26;55(8):1178-1185. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0690.
The direct bilirubin (D-Bil) assay on the AU Beckman Coulter instrumentation can be interfered by paraproteins, which may result in spurious D-Bil results. In a previous work, we took advantage of this fact to detect this interference, thus helping with the identification of patients with unsuspected monoclonal gammopathies. In this work, we investigate the possibility to detect interference based on the review of the photometric reactions, regardless of the D-Bil result.
The D-Bil assay was carried out in a set of 2164 samples. It included a group of 164 samples with paraproteins (67 of which caused interference on the assay), as well as different groups of samples for which high absorbance background readings could also be expected (i.e. hemolyzed, lipemic, or icteric samples). Photometric reaction data were reviewed and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to establish a cut-off for absorbance that best discriminates interference.
The best cut-off was 0.0100 for the absorbance at the first photometric point of the complementary wavelength in the blank cuvette. Once the optimal cut-off for probable interference was selected, all samples analyzed in our laboratory that provided absorbance values above this cut-off were further investigated to try to discover paraproteins. During a period of 6 months, we detected 44 samples containing paraproteins, five of which belonged to patients with non-diagnosed monoclonal gammopathies.
Review of the photometric reaction data permits the systematic detection of paraprotein interference on the D-Bil AU assay, even for samples for which reasonable results are obtained.
在贝克曼库尔特AU仪器上进行的直接胆红素(D-Bil)检测可能会受到副蛋白的干扰,这可能导致D-Bil结果出现假性。在之前的一项工作中,我们利用这一事实来检测这种干扰,从而有助于识别未被怀疑的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者。在这项工作中,我们研究了基于对光度反应的回顾来检测干扰的可能性,而不考虑D-Bil结果。
对一组2164个样本进行D-Bil检测。其中包括一组164个含有副蛋白的样本(其中67个对检测产生干扰),以及不同组的样本,这些样本也可能出现高吸光度背景读数(即溶血、脂血或黄疸样本)。回顾光度反应数据,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定能最佳区分干扰的吸光度临界值。
空白比色皿中互补波长第一个光度点的吸光度最佳临界值为0.0100。一旦选择了可能干扰的最佳临界值,我们实验室分析的所有提供高于此临界值吸光度值的样本都将进一步调查,以试图发现副蛋白。在6个月的时间里,我们检测到44个含有副蛋白的样本,其中5个属于未确诊的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者。
回顾光度反应数据可以系统地检测副蛋白对D-Bil AU检测的干扰,即使是对那些获得合理结果的样本。