Hopkins Raewyn J, Duan Fenghai, Chiles Caroline, Greco Erin M, Gamble Greg D, Aberle Denise, Young Robert P
1 Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
2 Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Mar;14(3):392-402. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-741OC.
Although epidemiological studies consistently show that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, debate exists as to whether there is a linear relationship between the severity of airflow limitation and lung cancer risk.
We examined this in a large, prospective study of older heavy smokers from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network subcohort of the National Lung Screening Trial (ACRIN). Airflow limitation was defined by prebronchodilator spirometry subgrouped according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1-4.
In the National Lung Screening Trial-ACRIN cohort of 18,473 screening participants, 6,436 had airflow limitation (35%) and 12,037 (65%) had no airflow limitation. From these groups, 758 lung cancer cases were prospectively identified. Participants with airflow limitation were stratified according to GOLD groups 1 (n = 1,607), 2 (n = 3,528), 3 (n = 1,083), and 4 (n = 211). Lung cancer incidence at study end (mean follow-up, 6.4 yr) was compared between the GOLD groups and those with no airflow limitation (referent group).
Compared with those with no airflow limitation, where lung cancer incidence was 3.78/1,000 person years, incidence rates increased in a simple linear relationship: GOLD 1 (6.27/1,000 person yr); GOLD 2 (7.86/1,000 person yr); GOLD 3 (10.71/1,000 person yr); and GOLD 4 (13.25/1,000 person yr). All relationships were significant versus the reference group at a P value of 0.0001 or less.
In a large prospective study of high-risk cigarette smokers, we report a strong linear relationship between increasing severity of airflow limitation and risk of lung cancer.
尽管流行病学研究一致表明慢性阻塞性肺疾病与肺癌风险增加相关,但关于气流受限严重程度与肺癌风险之间是否存在线性关系仍存在争议。
我们在美国国立肺癌筛查试验(NLST)的美国放射学会成像网络亚组中对大量老年重度吸烟者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以对此进行调查。气流受限通过支气管扩张剂前肺量计测定来定义,并根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)1-4级进行分组。
在NLST-ACRIN队列的18473名筛查参与者中,6436人(35%)存在气流受限,12037人(65%)不存在气流受限。从这些组中,前瞻性地确定了758例肺癌病例。气流受限的参与者根据GOLD 1组(n = 1607)、2组(n = 3528)、3组(n = 1083)和4组(n = 211)进行分层。比较了研究结束时(平均随访6.4年)GOLD组与无气流受限组(参照组)的肺癌发病率。
与无气流受限组(肺癌发病率为3.78/1000人年)相比,发病率呈简单线性增加:GOLD 1组(6.27/1000人年);GOLD 2组(7.86/1000人年);GOLD 3组(10.71/1000人年);GOLD 4组(13.25/1000人年)。与参照组相比,所有关系均具有显著性,P值小于或等于0.0001。
在一项针对高危吸烟者的大型前瞻性研究中,我们报告了气流受限严重程度增加与肺癌风险之间存在强烈的线性关系。