Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中谵妄诊断工具临时版的验证

Validation of the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional in intensive care units.

作者信息

Probert Julia, Valencia Camila, Bernal Carolina, Muñoz Nathaly, Kishi Yasuhiro, Yamaguchi Takako, Sepúlveda Esteban, Enriquez Raquel, Pérez Paulina, Pintor Luis, Franco José G, Trzepacz Paula T

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43212. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043212.

Abstract

Shortcomings of intensive care units (ICU) delirium screening tools include not measuring its core features, not excluding stupor/coma and not being continuous measurement instruments. We validated the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro) that assesses all 3 core symptom domains for delirium and subsyndromal delirium (SSD) in the ICU. This is a multicenter validation following STARD guideline. Delirium reference standards were DSM-5 criteria, cluster analysis (CA) of the DDT-Pro scores and clinical validators for preestablished DDT-Pro ≤ 6 and ≤ 7 cutoffs (0-9 range) for delirium and SSD. DDT-Pro dimensionality and internal consistency reliability are reported. Of 127 patients, 29 (22.8%) had DSM-5 delirium. The area under the receiver-operator DDT-Pro curve was 90% with the ≤ 7 and ≤ 6 DDT-Pro cutoffs which had 82.7% and 80.3% accuracy at the most balanced sensitivity-specificity. The ≤ 6 cutoff specificity (85.7%) was higher, while ≤ 7 cutoff sensitivity (89.7%) was higher with NPV = 96.2%. According to CA, ≤7 cutoff differentiated 100% of nondelirium patients from SSD and delirium, whereas DSM-5 misattributed SSD. Validation of an SSD group was supported by delirium severity gradients and various clinical validators. Cases in this CA also coincided exactly with nondelirium, SSD and delirium groups prespecified by DDT-Pro cutoffs from non-ICU samples. One factor explained 69.9% of the DDT-Pro variance, Cronbach α = 0.79 (cohesive delirium dimension). Our findings indicate that the DDT-Pro has very good construct validity and discriminates ICU delirium against DSM-5, performing even more cleanly using agnostic CA for SSD and delirium diagnosis. Its continuous score structure discernment of SSD was supported by clinical validators. ICU cutoffs were the same as in previous inpatient samples.

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄筛查工具的缺点包括未测量其核心特征、未排除木僵/昏迷状态以及不是连续测量工具。我们验证了谵妄诊断工具临时版(DDT-Pro),该工具可评估ICU中谵妄和亚综合征性谵妄(SSD)的所有3个核心症状领域。这是一项遵循STARD指南的多中心验证研究。谵妄参考标准为DSM-5标准、DDT-Pro评分的聚类分析(CA)以及针对预先确定的DDT-Pro≤6和≤7临界值(0-9范围)的谵妄和SSD的临床验证指标。报告了DDT-Pro的维度和内部一致性信度。127例患者中,29例(22.8%)符合DSM-5谵妄诊断标准。在最平衡的敏感性-特异性情况下,DDT-Pro曲线下面积为90%,DDT-Pro≤7和≤6临界值的准确率分别为82.7%和80.3%。≤6临界值的特异性(85.7%)更高,而≤7临界值的敏感性(89.7%)更高,阴性预测值为96.2%。根据聚类分析,≤7临界值能将100%的非谵妄患者与SSD和谵妄患者区分开来,而DSM-5将SSD误诊。谵妄严重程度梯度和各种临床验证指标支持了SSD组的验证。该聚类分析中的病例也与非ICU样本中由DDT-Pro临界值预先指定的非谵妄、SSD和谵妄组完全一致。一个因素解释了DDT-Pro变异的69.9%,Cronbach α = 0.79(凝聚性谵妄维度)。我们的研究结果表明,DDT-Pro具有非常好的结构效度,能够区分ICU谵妄与DSM-5标准,在使用不可知聚类分析进行SSD和谵妄诊断时表现更为清晰。其连续评分结构对SSD的识别得到了临床验证指标的支持。ICU临界值与之前住院患者样本中的相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验