Willett Andrew B S, Marken Richard S, Parker Maximilian G, Mansell Warren
Department of Cognitive Science, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, 12604, USA.
Department of Psychology, Antioch University, Los Angeles, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):841-849. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1268-3.
There is limited evidence regarding the accuracy of inferences about intention. The research described in this article shows how perceptual control theory (PCT) can provide a "ground truth" for these judgments. In a series of 3 studies, participants were asked to identify a person's intention in a tracking task where the person's true intention was to control the position of a knot connecting a pair of rubber bands. Most participants failed to correctly infer the person's intention, instead inferring complex but nonexistent goals (such as "tracing out two kangaroos boxing") based on the actions taken to keep the knot under control. Therefore, most of our participants experienced what we call "control blindness." The effect persisted with many participants even when their awareness was successfully directed at the knot whose position was under control. Beyond exploring the control blindness phenomenon in the context of our studies, we discuss its implications for psychological research and public policy.
关于意图推断准确性的证据有限。本文所述研究展示了感知控制理论(PCT)如何为这些判断提供“基本事实”。在一系列三项研究中,参与者被要求在一项追踪任务中识别一个人的意图,在该任务中,此人的真实意图是控制连接一对橡皮筋的绳结的位置。大多数参与者未能正确推断出此人的意图,而是基于为控制绳结所采取的行动推断出复杂但不存在的目标(例如“描绘出两只袋鼠拳击”)。因此,我们的大多数参与者都经历了我们所说的“控制盲视”。即使许多参与者的意识被成功引导到其位置受到控制的绳结上,这种效应仍然存在。除了在我们的研究背景下探讨控制盲视现象之外,我们还讨论了它对心理学研究和公共政策的影响。