• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自由生活条件下腕部佩戴式和髋部佩戴式活动监测器的比较。

Comparison of wrist-worn and hip-worn activity monitors under free living conditions.

作者信息

Hargens Trent A, Deyarmin Kayla N, Snyder Kelsey M, Mihalik Allison G, Sharpe Lauren E

机构信息

a Department of Kinesiology , Human Performance Laboratory, James Madison University , Harrisonburg , VA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Apr;41(3):200-207. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1271046. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1080/03091902.2016.1271046
PMID:28078908
Abstract

PURPOSE

Current recommendations state that individuals engage in 150 min of moderate or 75 min of vigorous intensity physical activity (PA) each week. Commercial PA monitors are becoming popular for everyday use. The accuracy of these devices, however, is not well understood. We sought to examine the accuracy of two commercial devices, one wrist and one hip-worn, under free-living conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-two subjects wore two commercially available devices and one ActiGraph (AG) for seven consecutive days under normal activity.

RESULTS

Mean steps per day between all three devices differed significantly. No differences were found in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MPVA). Daily energy expenditure (EE) also differed significantly between the AG and the commercial devices. Bland-Altman analysis found poor agreement between the AG and the commercial devices with regards to steps and EE, but good agreement in MVPA.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that the commercial devices are less accurate in estimating steps and EE. These devices did show good agreement with regards to MVPA, suggesting that they may provide useful feedback for individuals seeking to achieve the current PA guidelines for MVPA. Improvements are needed with regards to steps and EE estimation.

摘要

目的

当前建议指出,个体每周应进行150分钟中等强度或75分钟高强度体育活动(PA)。商业性PA监测器在日常使用中越来越受欢迎。然而,这些设备的准确性尚未得到充分了解。我们试图在自由生活条件下检验两种商业设备(一种戴在手腕上,一种戴在臀部)的准确性。

方法

22名受试者在正常活动情况下连续七天佩戴两种市售设备和一台ActiGraph(AG)。

结果

所有三种设备之间的日均步数差异显著。在中等至高强度体育活动(MPVA)方面未发现差异。AG与商业设备之间的每日能量消耗(EE)也存在显著差异。Bland-Altman分析发现,AG与商业设备在步数和EE方面的一致性较差,但在MVPA方面一致性良好。

结论

结果表明,商业设备在估计步数和EE方面准确性较低。这些设备在MVPA方面确实显示出良好的一致性,这表明它们可能为寻求达到当前MVPA PA指南的个体提供有用的反馈。在步数和EE估计方面需要改进。

相似文献

1
Comparison of wrist-worn and hip-worn activity monitors under free living conditions.自由生活条件下腕部佩戴式和髋部佩戴式活动监测器的比较。
J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Apr;41(3):200-207. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1271046. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
2
Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.使用腕部和髋部佩戴的加速度计评估儿童的身体活动。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Dec;46(12):2308-16. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000365.
3
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
4
The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.自由生活条件下佩戴的消费者级活动监测器在健康成年人中的有效性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Mar 27;12:42. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0201-9.
5
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
6
Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.腕戴式Fitbit Flex与腰戴式ActiGraph在测量自由生活成年人步数方面的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172535. eCollection 2017.
7
Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.在自然生活环境中估算身体活动和久坐行为:Fitbit Charge 2 和 Actigraph GT3X 的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234426. eCollection 2020.
8
Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.腕戴和髋戴 ActiGraph GT3X 在非实验室自由活动环境中自动佩戴时间检测算法的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9.
9
Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment.在自由生活环境中,将Fitbit活动监测器与ActiGraph GT3X+针对成年女性进行比较时的有效性和可靠性。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jun;20(6):578-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.一种用于从手腕和臀部加速度计预测能量消耗及身体活动类型的随机森林分类器。
Physiol Meas. 2014 Nov;35(11):2191-203. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2191. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical activity and sedentary behavior in peritoneal dialysis patients: a comparative analysis of ActiGraph GT3X data collected via wrist and waist with placement-specific cut-points.腹膜透析患者的身体活动与久坐行为:通过手腕和腰部佩戴ActiGraph GT3X收集的数据并采用特定部位切点的比较分析
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04100-8.
2
Accuracy and reliability of accelerometer-based pedometers in step counts during walking, running, and stair climbing in different locations of attachment.基于加速度计的计步器在不同附着位置的行走、跑步和爬楼梯时的步数计数的准确性和可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78684-w.
3
Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers to measure and coach patients with lower limb lymphoedema.
基于消费者的活动追踪器测量和指导下肢淋巴水肿患者的准确性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0305768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305768. eCollection 2024.
4
Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.基于可穿戴设备评估成年人 24 小时身体活动的自由生活验证研究的质量评价:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):e36377. doi: 10.2196/36377.
5
Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.腕戴式活动追踪设备的准确性和可接受性:文献系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e30791. doi: 10.2196/30791.
6
New strategies of physical activity assessment in cystic fibrosis: a pilot study.囊性纤维化患者身体活动评估的新策略:一项试点研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01313-5.
7
Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.市面上可用于测量步数、能量消耗和心率的可穿戴设备的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 8;8(9):e18694. doi: 10.2196/18694.
8
Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.在自然生活环境中估算身体活动和久坐行为:Fitbit Charge 2 和 Actigraph GT3X 的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234426. eCollection 2020.
9
Feasibility of the Energy Expenditure Prediction for Athletes and Non-Athletes from Ankle-Mounted Accelerometer and Heart Rate Monitor.基于踝部加速度计和心率监测器预测运动员和非运动员能量消耗的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 1;10(1):8816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65713-7.
10
Validity of smartphones and activity trackers to measure steps in a free-living setting over three consecutive days.智能手机和活动追踪器在连续三天的自由生活环境中测量步数的有效性。
Physiol Meas. 2020 Jan 30;41(1):015001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab635f.