Suppr超能文献

肝切除术的三点输血风险评分。

Three-point transfusion risk score in hepatectomy.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):434-442. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10416. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative red blood cell transfusions are required in up to 23 per cent of patients undergoing hepatectomy. Previous research has developed three transfusion risk scores to assess risk of perioperative red blood cell transfusion. Here, the performance of these transfusion risk scores was evaluated in a multicentre cohort of patients who underwent hepatectomy and compared with that of a simplified transfusion risk score.

METHODS

A database of patients undergoing hepatectomy at four specialized centres between 2008 and 2012 was developed. External validity was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Calibration was evaluated by the degree of agreement between predicted and actual red blood cell transfusion probabilities. A simplified transfusion risk score using variables common to the three models was created, and discrimination and calibration were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 1287 patients included in this study, with 341 (26·5 per cent) receiving a red blood cell transfusion. Discriminative ability was similar between the three transfusion risk scores, with AUCs of 0·66-0·68 and good calibration. A new three-point risk score was developed based on factors present in all models: haemoglobin 12·5 g/dl or less, primary liver malignancy and major resection (at least 4 segments). Discriminative ability and calibration of the three-point model were similar to those of the three existing models, with an AUC of 0·66.

CONCLUSION

The three-point transfusion risk score simplifies assessment of perioperative transfusion risk in hepatectomy without sacrificing predictive ability.

摘要

背景

在接受肝切除术的患者中,多达 23%需要围手术期输红细胞。先前的研究已经开发了三种输血风险评分来评估围手术期输红细胞的风险。在这里,评估了这些输血风险评分在接受肝切除术的多中心患者队列中的表现,并与简化的输血风险评分进行了比较。

方法

开发了 2008 年至 2012 年在四个专业中心接受肝切除术的患者数据库。通过区分度和校准来评估外部有效性。使用接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积(AUC)评估区分度。通过预测和实际输红细胞概率之间的一致性程度来评估校准。使用三个模型中常见的变量创建了简化的输血风险评分,并评估了区分度和校准。

结果

本研究共纳入 1287 例患者,其中 341 例(26.5%)接受了红细胞输血。三种输血风险评分的判别能力相似,AUC 为 0.66-0.68,且校准良好。基于所有模型中存在的因素,开发了一种新的三分风险评分:血红蛋白 12.5g/dl 或更低、原发性肝恶性肿瘤和大切除(至少 4 个节段)。三分模型的判别能力和校准与现有的三种模型相似,AUC 为 0.66。

结论

三分输血风险评分在不牺牲预测能力的情况下简化了肝切除术围手术期输血风险的评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验