Suppr超能文献

儿童椎体骨折评估:双能X线吸收法成像与传统脊柱X线摄影术的评估

Vertebral fractures assessment in children: Evaluation of DXA imaging versus conventional spine radiography.

作者信息

Crabtree N J, Chapman S, Högler W, Hodgson K, Chapman D, Bebbington N, Shaw N J

机构信息

Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Dept. of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Dept. of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Bone. 2017 Apr;97:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 7.

Abstract

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA is an accepted tool in adults. However, its use in children has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate DXA VFA and morphometric analysis (MXA) using a GE Lunar iDXA bone densitometer against spinal radiographic assessment (RA) for the identification of vertebral fractures in children. Spine RA and VFA (T3-L5) were acquired on the same day in 80 children. Forty children considered high risk for fracture by their metabolic bone specialist were referred for spinal RA. Another 40 children were recruited as part of a prospective fracture study and were considered low risk for vertebral fracture. Agreement between RA and VFA was assessed by an expert paediatric radiologist and two paediatricians with expertise in bone pathology. Agreement between RA and MXA was assessed by an expert paediatric radiologist, two clinical scientists and an experienced paediatric radiographer. Vertebrae were ranked as normal, mild, moderate or severe if they had <10%, 11-25%, 26-50% and >50% deformity, respectively. Levels of agreement were calculated using the Cohen kappa score. Evaluating the data from all readable vertebrae, 121 mild, 44 moderate and 16 severe vertebral fractures were identified; with 26, 8, and 5 subjects having at least one mild, moderate or severe fracture, respectively. Depending on rater, 92.8-94.8% of the vertebrae were evaluable by RA. In contrast, 98.4% were evaluable by VFA and only 83.6% were evaluable by MXA. Moderate agreement was found between raters for RA [kappa 0.526-0.592], and VFA [kappa 0.601-0.658] and between RA and VFA [kappa 0.630-0.687]. In contrast, only slight agreement was noted between raters for MXA [kappa 0.361-0.406] and between VFA and MXA [kappa 0.137-0.325]. Agreement substantially improved if the deformities were dichotomised as normal or mild versus moderate or severe [kappa 0.826-0.834]. For the detection of moderate and/or severe fractures the sensitivities & specificities were 81.3% & 99.3%, and 62.5% & 99.2% for VFA and MXA, respectively. This study demonstrates that VFA is as good as RA for detecting moderate and severe vertebral fractures. Given the significant radiation dose saving of VFA compared with RA, VFA is recommended as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of moderate or severe vertebral fracture in children.

摘要

双能X线吸收法(DXA)进行椎体骨折评估在成人中是一种公认的工具。然而,其在儿童中的应用尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是使用GE Lunar iDXA骨密度仪评估DXA椎体骨折评估(VFA)和形态计量分析(MXA),并与脊柱X线摄片评估(RA)进行对比,以识别儿童椎体骨折。在80名儿童中于同一天进行了脊柱RA和VFA(T3-L5)检查。40名被代谢性骨病专科医生认为有高骨折风险的儿童被转诊进行脊柱RA检查。另外40名儿童作为前瞻性骨折研究的一部分被招募,被认为椎体骨折风险较低。一名儿科放射专家和两名在骨病理学方面有专长的儿科医生评估了RA和VFA之间的一致性。一名儿科放射专家、两名临床科学家和一名经验丰富的儿科放射技师评估了RA和MXA之间的一致性。如果椎体畸形分别<10%、11-25%、26-50%和>50%,则将其分为正常、轻度、中度或重度。使用Cohen kappa评分计算一致性水平。评估所有可读椎体的数据,共识别出121例轻度、44例中度和16例重度椎体骨折;分别有26、8和5名受试者至少有一处轻度、中度或重度骨折。根据评估者不同,RA可评估92.8%-94.8%的椎体。相比之下,VFA可评估98.4%,而MXA仅可评估83.6%。评估者之间在RA [kappa 0.526-0.592]、VFA [kappa 0.601-0.658]以及RA和VFA之间 [kappa 0.630-0.687]发现有中度一致性。相比之下,评估者之间在MXA [kappa 0.361-0.406]以及VFA和MXA之间 [kappa 0.137-0.325]仅发现有轻微一致性。如果将畸形分为正常或轻度与中度或重度,则一致性显著提高 [kappa 0.826-0.834]。对于中度和/或重度骨折的检测,VFA和MXA的敏感性和特异性分别为81.3%和99.3%,以及62.5%和99.2%。本研究表明,VFA在检测中度和重度椎体骨折方面与RA一样好。鉴于与RA相比VFA显著节省辐射剂量,推荐将VFA作为评估儿童中度或重度椎体骨折的诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验