Suppr超能文献

全身 F-FDG PET/CT 优于 CT 作为一线诊断成像在有严重非特异性癌症症状或体征的患者中:200 例患者的随机前瞻性研究。

Whole-Body F-FDG PET/CT Is Superior to CT as First-Line Diagnostic Imaging in Patients Referred with Serious Nonspecific Symptoms or Signs of Cancer: A Randomized Prospective Study of 200 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2017 Jul;58(7):1058-1064. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.175380. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

A fast-track pathway has been established in Denmark to investigate patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC), who are not eligible to enter an organ-specific cancer program. The prevalence of cancer in this cohort is approximately 20%. The optimal screening strategy in patients with NSSC remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate whether F-FDG PET/CT was superior to CT as an initial imaging modality in patients with NSSC. In a randomized prospective trial, the imaging modalities were compared with regard to diagnostic performance. Two hundred patients were randomized 1:1 to whole-body F-FDG PET/CT or CT of the thorax and abdomen as the imaging modality. A tentative diagnosis was established after first-line imaging. The final referral diagnosis was adjudicated by the physician, when sufficient data were available. One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for analysis because 3 patients withdrew consent before scanning. Thirty-nine (20%) patients were diagnosed with cancer, 10 (5%) with an infection, 15 (8%) with an autoimmune disease, and 76 (39%) with other diseases. In the remaining 57 patients (28%), no specific disease was found. F-FDG PET/CT had a higher specificity (96% vs. 85%; = 0.028) and a higher accuracy (94% vs. 82%; = 0.017) than CT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (83% vs. 70%) or negative predictive values (96% vs. 92%). No difference in days to final referral diagnosis according to randomization group could be shown (7.2 vs. 7.6 d). However, for the subgroups in which the imaging modality showed a suggestion of malignancy, there was a significant delay to final diagnosis in the CT group compared with the F-FDG PET/CT group (11.6 vs. 5.7 d; = 0.02). Compared with CT, we found a higher diagnostic specificity and accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT for detecting cancer in patients with NSSC. F-FDG PET/CT should therefore be considered as first-line imaging in this group of patients.

摘要

丹麦建立了一条快速通道,用于调查患有严重非特异性癌症症状和体征(NSSC)且不符合特定器官癌症计划资格的患者。该队列中癌症的患病率约为 20%。NSSC 患者的最佳筛查策略仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 F-FDG PET/CT 是否优于 CT 作为 NSSC 患者的初始影像学检查方法。在一项随机前瞻性试验中,比较了两种影像学检查方法的诊断性能。200 名患者按 1:1 比例随机分为全身 F-FDG PET/CT 或胸部和腹部 CT 作为影像学检查方法。一线成像后建立暂定诊断。当有足够的数据时,由医生裁决最终转诊诊断。由于 3 名患者在扫描前撤回同意,因此有 197 名患者可进行分析。39 名(20%)患者被诊断为癌症,10 名(5%)患者为感染,15 名(8%)患者为自身免疫性疾病,76 名(39%)患者为其他疾病。在其余 57 名(28%)患者中,未发现特定疾病。与 CT 相比,F-FDG PET/CT 的特异性(96%对 85%; = 0.028)和准确性(94%对 82%; = 0.017)更高。然而,在敏感性(83%对 70%)或阴性预测值(96%对 92%)方面没有统计学差异。根据随机分组,无法显示最终转诊诊断的天数有差异(7.2 对 7.6 d)。然而,对于影像学检查提示恶性肿瘤的亚组,与 F-FDG PET/CT 组相比,CT 组的最终诊断明显延迟(11.6 对 5.7 d; = 0.02)。与 CT 相比,我们发现 F-FDG PET/CT 对 NSSC 患者癌症的诊断特异性和准确性更高。因此,F-FDG PET/CT 应作为该组患者的一线影像学检查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验