Stevens Louis-Mathieu, Noiseux Nicolas, Avezum Alvaro, Ayapati Dharma Rakshak, Chen Xin, Lucchese Fernando Antonio, Cacheda Horacio, Parvathaneni Sirish, Ou Yongning, Lamy André
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Research Division, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):539-546. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw361.
Emergent and late conversions form OFF-to-ON pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been associated with worse outcomes, however, it remains unclear as to which risk factors are associated with conversion and how to prevent them.
Among 4718 patients who randomly underwent off- or on-pump CABG, the incidence of off-pump to on-pump cross-over, or 'OFF-to-ON conversion', was 7.9% (186/2356). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or new renal failure requiring dialysis. We assessed the risk factors and outcomes of converted patients.
Emergent OFF-to-ON conversions, defined as conversions for hypotension or ischaemia, were required for 3.2% of patients ( n = 75), while most elective conversions were due to small or intramuscular coronaries ( n = 83). OFF-to-ON converted patients required increased surgery time, blood transfusions, intensive care unit stay, and presented a higher incidence at 1 year of the composite outcome compared with non-converted off-pump patients (all P < 0.01), especially if the conversion was emergent. Conversely, elective conversions outcomes were no different compared with non-converted off-pump patients ( P = 0.35). Independent predictors of emergent conversions included higher heart rate or chronic atrial fibrillation, urgent surgery, more grafts planned and surgeon experience with off-pump CABG.
Emergent OFF-to-ON conversion is associated with worse outcomes compared with elective conversion or no conversion. In the presence of risk factors for emergent conversion, an early and elective conversion approach is a judicious strategy.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的急诊和晚期转为体外循环手术与更差的预后相关,然而,哪些危险因素与转为体外循环相关以及如何预防这些危险因素仍不清楚。
在4718例随机接受非体外循环或体外循环CABG的患者中,非体外循环转为体外循环交叉转换(即“非体外循环转体外循环转换”)的发生率为7.9%(186/2356)。主要结局是死亡、中风、心肌梗死或需要透析的新发肾衰竭的复合结局。我们评估了转为体外循环患者的危险因素和结局。
3.2%的患者(n = 75)因低血压或缺血需要急诊非体外循环转体外循环转换,而大多数择期转换是由于冠状动脉细小或位于肌肉内(n = 83)。与未转换的非体外循环患者相比,非体外循环转体外循环转换的患者需要更长的手术时间、更多的输血、更长的重症监护病房住院时间,并且1年时复合结局的发生率更高(所有P < 0.01),尤其是如果转换是急诊的。相反,择期转换的结局与未转换的非体外循环患者相比无差异(P = 0.35)。急诊转换的独立预测因素包括心率较高或慢性心房颤动、急诊手术、计划的移植血管更多以及外科医生的非体外循环CABG经验。
与择期转换或未转换相比,急诊非体外循环转体外循环转换与更差的结局相关。在存在急诊转换危险因素的情况下,早期择期转换方法是一种明智的策略。