Nararak Jirod, Sathantriphop Sunaiyana, Kongmee Monthathip, Bangs Michael J, Chareonviriyaphap Theeraphap
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand (
National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand (
J Med Entomol. 2017 Jan;54(1):178-186. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw143. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
The essential oils of kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix DC.) at four different concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0% v/v) were studied for their repellency, excitation, and knockdown properties against laboratory strains of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Anopheles minimus Theobald using an excito-repellency test system. Both contact and noncontact escape responses to leaf- and peel-derived kaffir lime oils were observed. Comparing unadjusted escape responses for An. minimus, leaf oil had strong combined irritant and repellent activity responses at 1-5% concentrations (90.0-96.4% escape) and the strongest spatial repellent activity at 1% and 2% (85.9% and 87.2% escape, respectively). The peel oil exhibited good excitation with repellency at concentrations of 2.5% (89.8% escape) and 5% (96.28% escape), while concentrations 1-5% showed more moderate repellent activity against An. minimus. For Ae. aegypti, 2.5% leaf oil produced the greatest response for both contact (56.1% escape) and noncontact (63.3% escape) trials, while 2.5% produced the strongest response among all concentrations of peel oil, with 46.5% escape. However, after adjusting the contact trial escape (a measure of combined excitation and repellency), the estimated escape due to contact alone was a much weaker response than spatial repellency for both species. Knockdown responses above 50% were only observed in Ae. aegypti exposed to 5% leaf oil. Kaffir lime oils were more active against An. minimus than Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. There were statistically significant differences between leaf (more active) and peel oils at each concentration against An. minimus in contact and noncontact trials, except at the highest (5%) concentration.
采用兴奋驱避试验系统,研究了四种不同浓度(0.5%、1.0%、2.5%和5.0%,v/v)的卡菲尔酸橙(Citrus hystrix DC.)精油对埃及伊蚊(Aedes aegypti (L.))和微小按蚊(Anopheles minimus Theobald)实验室品系的驱避、兴奋和击倒特性。观察了对叶源和果皮源卡菲尔酸橙精油的接触性和非接触性逃避反应。比较微小按蚊未经调整的逃避反应,叶精油在1%-5%浓度下具有强烈的刺激和驱避活性联合反应(逃避率90.0%-96.4%),在1%和2%浓度下具有最强的空间驱避活性(分别为85.9%和87.2%逃避率)。果皮精油在2.5%(逃避率89.8%)和5%(逃避率96.28%)浓度下表现出良好的兴奋与驱避性,而1%-5%浓度对微小按蚊表现出更适度的驱避活性。对于埃及伊蚊,2.5%叶精油在接触试验(逃避率56.1%)和非接触试验(逃避率63.3%)中产生的反应最大,而2.5%在所有浓度的果皮精油中产生的反应最强,逃避率为46.5%。然而,在调整接触试验逃避率(一种刺激和驱避联合作用的度量)后,对于这两个物种,仅由接触引起的估计逃避反应比空间驱避反应弱得多。仅在接触5%叶精油的埃及伊蚊中观察到击倒反应高于50%。卡菲尔酸橙精油对微小按蚊的活性比对埃及伊蚊的活性更强。在每种浓度下,叶精油(活性更强)和果皮精油在接触和非接触试验中对微小按蚊的差异具有统计学意义,但在最高(5%)浓度时除外。