Miani Celine, Marjanovic Sonja, Jones Molly Morgan, Marshall Martin, Meikle Samantha, Nolte Ellen
Rand Health Q. 2013 Sep 1;3(3):8. eCollection 2013 Fall.
Leadership is seen to be central to improving the quality of healthcare and existing research suggests that absence of leadership is related to poor quality and safety performance. Leadership training might therefore provide an important means through which to promote quality improvement and, more widely, performance within the healthcare environment. This article presents an evaluation of the Fellowships in Clinical Leadership Programme, which combines leadership training and quality improvement initiatives with the placement of temporary external clinical champions in Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust. We assessed impacts of the Programme on individual and organisational change, alongside core enablers and barriers for Programme success. Analyses drew on the principles of a theory-of-change-led realist evaluation, using logic modelling to specify the underlying causal mechanisms of the Programme. Data collection involved a stakeholder workshop, online questionnaires of programme participants, senior managers and support staff (n=114), and follow-up in-depth semi-structured interviews with a subsample of survey participants (n=15). We observed that the Programme had notable impacts at individual and organisational levels. Examples of individual impact included enhanced communication and negotiation skills or increased confidence as a result of multi-modal leadership training. At the organisational level, participants reported indications of behaviour change among staff, with evidence of spill-over effects to non-participants towards a greater focus on patient-centred care. Our findings suggest that there is potential for combined leadership training and quality improvement programmes to contribute to strengthening a culture of care quality in healthcare organisations. Our study provides useful insights into strategies seeking to achieve sustainable improvement in NHS organisations.
领导力被视为提高医疗质量的核心要素,现有研究表明,缺乏领导力与质量欠佳和安全表现不佳有关。因此,领导力培训可能是促进质量改进的重要手段,更广泛地说,是促进医疗环境中绩效提升的重要手段。本文对临床领导力项目奖学金进行了评估,该项目将领导力培训和质量改进举措与在巴金、哈弗林和雷德布里奇大学医院国民保健服务信托基金中安排临时外部临床倡导者相结合。我们评估了该项目对个人和组织变革的影响,以及项目成功的核心推动因素和障碍。分析借鉴了以变革理论为导向的现实主义评估原则,使用逻辑模型来确定该项目的潜在因果机制。数据收集包括一次利益相关者研讨会、对项目参与者、高级管理人员和支持人员(n = 114)的在线问卷调查,以及对部分调查参与者(n = 15)进行的后续深入半结构化访谈。我们观察到,该项目在个人和组织层面都产生了显著影响。个人层面的影响示例包括,通过多模式领导力培训提高了沟通和谈判技巧或增强了信心。在组织层面,参与者报告称员工行为有变化迹象,有证据表明对非参与者产生了溢出效应,使他们更注重以患者为中心的护理。我们的研究结果表明,将领导力培训和质量改进项目相结合,有可能有助于加强医疗保健组织中的护理质量文化。我们的研究为寻求在国民保健服务组织中实现可持续改进的策略提供了有益的见解。