Suppr超能文献

国家法定报告:甚至连勾选框都没有做到?2017-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度中质量账户内“从死亡中学习”报告的质量。

National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of 'Learning from Deaths' reporting in quality accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020.

机构信息

Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK

Advisor/Lived experience, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002092.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Regulation through statutory reporting is used in healthcare internationally to improve accountability, quality of care and patient safety. Since 2017, within the National Health Service (NHS) in England, NHS Secondary Care Trusts (NSCTs) are legally required to report annually both quantitative and qualitative information related to patient deaths within their care within their publicly available Quality Accounts as part of a countrywide patient safety programme: The Learning from Deaths (LfDs) programme.

METHOD

All LfDs reports published between 2017 (programme inception) and 2020 were reviewed and evaluated through a critical realist lens, quantitatively reported using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In 2017/2018, 44% of NSCTs reported all six statutory elements of the LfDs reporting regulations, in 2019/2020 35% of NSCTs were reporting this information. A small number of NSCTs did not report any parts of the LfDs regulatory requirements between 2017 and 2020. Multiple qualitative themes arose from this study suggesting problematic engagement with the LfDs programme, erroneous reporting accuracy and errors in written communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The LfDs programme has, to some extent, reduced variation and improved consistency to the way that NSCTs identify, report and investigate deaths. However, 3 years into the LfDs programme, the majority of NSCTs are not reporting as required by law. This makes the validity of National statutory reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England questionable as a regulatory process.

摘要

简介

国际上,通过法定报告进行监管被用于提高医疗保健的问责制、护理质量和患者安全。自 2017 年以来,在英格兰的国民保健服务体系(NHS)中,NHS 二级保健信托(NSCT)被法律要求每年在其公开的质量账户中报告与其护理范围内的患者死亡相关的定量和定性信息,作为全国患者安全计划的一部分:学习死亡(LfD)计划。

方法

通过批判现实主义视角审查和评估了 2017 年(计划开始)至 2020 年期间发布的所有 LfD 报告,使用描述性统计数据进行定量报告,并使用反思性主题分析进行定性分析。

结果

在 2017/2018 年,44%的 NSCT 报告了 LfD 报告法规的所有六个法定要素,在 2019/2020 年,35%的 NSCT 报告了这些信息。少数 NSCT 在 2017 年至 2020 年间未报告 LfD 监管要求的任何部分。本研究提出了一些有问题的主题,包括对 LfD 计划的参与、错误的报告准确性和书面沟通中的错误。

结论

LfD 计划在一定程度上减少了 NSCT 识别、报告和调查死亡的方式的变化,并提高了一致性。然而,在 LfD 计划实施 3 年后,大多数 NSCT 并未按照法律要求进行报告。这使得英格兰 NHS 质量账户中的国家法定报告作为监管过程的有效性受到质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验