• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of 'Learning from Deaths' reporting in quality accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020.国家法定报告:甚至连勾选框都没有做到?2017-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度中质量账户内“从死亡中学习”报告的质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002092.
2
NHS 'Learning from Deaths' reports: a qualitative and quantitative document analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme.NHS《死亡学习》报告:全国患者安全计划实施第一年的定性和定量文献分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e046619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046619.
3
Is anybody 'Learning' from deaths? Sequential content and reflexive thematic analysis of national statutory reporting within the NHS in England 2017-2020.有人从死亡中吸取教训吗?2017-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度国家法定报告中的连续内容和反思性主题分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002093.
4
Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study.加强英国国民保健制度产科服务中的公开披露:DISCERN 现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(22):1-159. doi: 10.3310/YTDF8015.
5
Understanding the factors influencing implementation of a new national patient safety policy in England: Lessons from 'learning from deaths'.了解影响英国新国家患者安全政策实施的因素:从“死亡学习”中吸取的教训。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):50-57. doi: 10.1177/13558196221096921. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.快速评估质量特别措施和有问题的供应商制度:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512.
7
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.NHS 健康检查后会发生什么?一项调查和现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127.
8
The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: A microsimulation study.英格兰国民保健署健康检查心血管疾病预防计划的当前和潜在健康益处:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002517. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
A study of the implementation of patient safety policies in the NHS in England since 2000: what can we learn?自 2000 年以来,对英格兰国民保健制度中患者安全政策实施情况的研究:我们能从中吸取什么教训?
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Mar 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2021-0073.
10
Intentional rounding: a realist evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards.有意接触:急性和老年护理病房中案例研究的现实主义评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):1341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare Staff Perceptions Following Inoculation with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine at University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust.英国考文垂大学医院和沃里克郡国民保健服务信托的医疗保健工作人员在接种 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗后的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179378.
2
NHS 'Learning from Deaths' reports: a qualitative and quantitative document analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme.NHS《死亡学习》报告:全国患者安全计划实施第一年的定性和定量文献分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e046619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046619.
3
A narrative account of the key drivers in the development of the Learning from Deaths policy.学习死亡政策制定过程中的关键驱动因素的叙述性说明。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Oct;26(4):263-271. doi: 10.1177/13558196211010850. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
4
Mandatory reporting legislation in Canada: improving systems for patient safety?加拿大强制性报告立法:改善患者安全系统?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Jul;16(3):355-370. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000050. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
The Implementation of Improvement Interventions for "Low Performing" and "High Performing" Organisations in Health, Education and Local Government: A Phased Literature Review.改善卫生、教育和地方政府中“表现不佳”和“表现良好”组织的干预措施的实施:阶段性文献综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):874-882. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.197. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
6
Case study: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.案例研究:帝国理工学院医疗保健国民信托基金会。
Community Eye Health. 2019;32(106):29.
7
How to improve healthcare improvement-an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods.如何改善医疗保健——玛丽·迪克森 - 伍兹的一篇文章
BMJ. 2019 Oct 1;367:l5514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5514.
8
The effect of external inspections on safety in acute hospitals in the National Health Service in England: A controlled interrupted time-series analysis.外部检查对英格兰国民医疗服务体系中急症医院安全的影响:一项对照中断时间序列分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Jul;24(3):182-190. doi: 10.1177/1355819619837288. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Explaining organisational responses to a board-level quality improvement intervention: findings from an evaluation in six providers in the English National Health Service.解释组织对董事会层面质量改进干预措施的反应:来自英格兰国民保健服务体系中六家提供者评估的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):198-204. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008291. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It's Not) Hip to Be Square.格里姆斯通诉埃普索姆和圣赫利尔大学医院国民保健服务信托基金案:(并非)墨守成规也时尚
Med Law Rev. 2018 Nov 1;26(4):665-674. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx053.

国家法定报告:甚至连勾选框都没有做到?2017-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度中质量账户内“从死亡中学习”报告的质量。

National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of 'Learning from Deaths' reporting in quality accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020.

机构信息

Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK

Advisor/Lived experience, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002092.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002092
PMID:36764733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9923336/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Regulation through statutory reporting is used in healthcare internationally to improve accountability, quality of care and patient safety. Since 2017, within the National Health Service (NHS) in England, NHS Secondary Care Trusts (NSCTs) are legally required to report annually both quantitative and qualitative information related to patient deaths within their care within their publicly available Quality Accounts as part of a countrywide patient safety programme: The Learning from Deaths (LfDs) programme.

METHOD

All LfDs reports published between 2017 (programme inception) and 2020 were reviewed and evaluated through a critical realist lens, quantitatively reported using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In 2017/2018, 44% of NSCTs reported all six statutory elements of the LfDs reporting regulations, in 2019/2020 35% of NSCTs were reporting this information. A small number of NSCTs did not report any parts of the LfDs regulatory requirements between 2017 and 2020. Multiple qualitative themes arose from this study suggesting problematic engagement with the LfDs programme, erroneous reporting accuracy and errors in written communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The LfDs programme has, to some extent, reduced variation and improved consistency to the way that NSCTs identify, report and investigate deaths. However, 3 years into the LfDs programme, the majority of NSCTs are not reporting as required by law. This makes the validity of National statutory reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England questionable as a regulatory process.

摘要

简介

国际上,通过法定报告进行监管被用于提高医疗保健的问责制、护理质量和患者安全。自 2017 年以来,在英格兰的国民保健服务体系(NHS)中,NHS 二级保健信托(NSCT)被法律要求每年在其公开的质量账户中报告与其护理范围内的患者死亡相关的定量和定性信息,作为全国患者安全计划的一部分:学习死亡(LfD)计划。

方法

通过批判现实主义视角审查和评估了 2017 年(计划开始)至 2020 年期间发布的所有 LfD 报告,使用描述性统计数据进行定量报告,并使用反思性主题分析进行定性分析。

结果

在 2017/2018 年,44%的 NSCT 报告了 LfD 报告法规的所有六个法定要素,在 2019/2020 年,35%的 NSCT 报告了这些信息。少数 NSCT 在 2017 年至 2020 年间未报告 LfD 监管要求的任何部分。本研究提出了一些有问题的主题,包括对 LfD 计划的参与、错误的报告准确性和书面沟通中的错误。

结论

LfD 计划在一定程度上减少了 NSCT 识别、报告和调查死亡的方式的变化,并提高了一致性。然而,在 LfD 计划实施 3 年后,大多数 NSCT 并未按照法律要求进行报告。这使得英格兰 NHS 质量账户中的国家法定报告作为监管过程的有效性受到质疑。