Coderre Emily L, Chernenok Mariya, Gordon Barry, Ledoux Kerry
Division of Cognitive Neurology/Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Mar;47(3):795-812. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2985-0.
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) experience difficulties with language, particularly higher-level functions like semantic integration. Yet some studies indicate that semantic processing of non-linguistic stimuli is not impaired, suggesting a language-specific deficit in semantic processing. Using a semantic priming task, we compared event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to lexico-semantic processing (written words) and visuo-semantic processing (pictures) in adults with ASD and adults with typical development (TD). The ASD group showed successful lexico-semantic and visuo-semantic processing, indicated by similar N400 effects between groups for word and picture stimuli. However, differences in N400 latency and topography in word conditions suggested different lexico-semantic processing mechanisms: an expectancy-based strategy for the TD group but a controlled post-lexical integration strategy for the ASD group.
患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在语言方面存在困难,尤其是在语义整合等高级功能方面。然而,一些研究表明,非语言刺激的语义处理并未受损,这表明语义处理存在特定于语言的缺陷。我们使用语义启动任务,比较了患有ASD的成年人和发育正常(TD)的成年人在词汇语义处理(书面单词)和视觉语义处理(图片)时的事件相关电位(ERP)。ASD组在词汇语义和视觉语义处理方面表现成功,两组在单词和图片刺激下的N400效应相似。然而,单词条件下N400潜伏期和地形图的差异表明了不同的词汇语义处理机制:TD组采用基于预期的策略,而ASD组采用受控的词汇后整合策略。