Carmona-Bayonas Alberto, Jiménez Fonseca Paula, Virizuela Echaburu Juan
Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Regional Center of Hemodonation of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Medical Oncology Department, Central University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Pain Pract. 2017 Nov;17(8):1075-1088. doi: 10.1111/papr.12556. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
Pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent literature regarding tapentadol use in oncology patients and moderate or severe pain.
We have conducted a review of the literature using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for all manuscripts published between 2008 and 2016, using the key words "tapentadol," "cancer," "pain," "tumor," and "malignant."
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria (four randomized clinical trials and five prospective cohort studies). The scope of the literature was diverse, with 15 instruments used to measure different aspects of pain (intensity, health status, quality of life, psychometric and well-being, perception of change, and neuropathic pain). All these studies concluded that tapentadol is seemingly a well-tolerated and efficacious agent for moderate-severe cancer pain, with few typically mild adverse reactions. However, the most significant detected weaknesses of research were that (1) existing studies do not clearly show a superiority of tapentadol with respect to previous generation opioids, (2) low-to-moderate sample sizes prevent obtaining robust conclusions about effectiveness, (3) there was an absence of noninferiority trials comparing tapentadol vs. fentanyl or oxycodone-naloxone, and (4) there was scarce generalizability of prospective observational studies.
Tapentadol is seemingly an effective, well-tolerated alternative for moderate or severe cancer pain. Most prospective cohort studies have relatively small samples, are restricted to few research centers, and lack detailed subgroup information. More experience is required to draw valid generalizable conclusions.
疼痛是癌症患者最常见的症状之一。本综述的目的是总结关于曲马多在肿瘤患者中用于治疗中度或重度疼痛的最新文献。
我们使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和谷歌学术对2008年至2016年期间发表的所有手稿进行了文献综述,使用的关键词为“曲马多”、“癌症”、“疼痛”、“肿瘤”和“恶性”。
九项研究符合纳入标准(四项随机临床试验和五项前瞻性队列研究)。文献范围多样,使用了15种工具来测量疼痛的不同方面(强度、健康状况、生活质量、心理测量和幸福感、变化感知以及神经性疼痛)。所有这些研究得出结论,曲马多似乎是一种耐受性良好且有效的中度至重度癌症疼痛治疗药物,不良反应通常较轻。然而,研究中发现的最显著弱点是:(1)现有研究未明确表明曲马多相对于上一代阿片类药物具有优越性;(2)样本量低至中等,无法得出关于有效性的有力结论;(3)缺乏比较曲马多与芬太尼或羟考酮-纳洛酮的非劣效性试验;(4)前瞻性观察性研究的可推广性较差。
曲马多似乎是中度或重度癌症疼痛的一种有效且耐受性良好的替代药物。大多数前瞻性队列研究样本相对较小,局限于少数研究中心,且缺乏详细的亚组信息。需要更多经验才能得出有效的可推广结论。