Suppr超能文献

在英国,对于一线治疗药物吗啡治疗失败的严重非恶性慢性疼痛患者,与羟考酮控释片相比,曲马多缓释片的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of tapentadol prolonged release compared with oxycodone controlled release in the UK in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain who failed 1st line treatment with morphine.

机构信息

IMS Health, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):724-36. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.670174. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of tapentadol PR (prolonged release) compared with oxycodone CR (controlled release) in severe non-malignant chronic pain patients in whom controlled release morphine was ineffective or not tolerated.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to assess costs and benefits over a 1-year time horizon from the National Health Service perspective in the UK. Patients could either continue on 2nd line therapy or switch to 3rd line opioid due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. Patients failing also 3rd line therapy entered the final absorbing health state (4th line). Data on tolerability, efficacy, and utilities for tapentadol and oxycodone were obtained from the three comparative phase III clinical trials. Costs of resource consumption associated with opioid treatment were derived from a retrospective database analysis of anonymized patient records.

RESULTS

The model results predicted that initiating 2nd line therapy with tapentadol leads to higher effectiveness and lower costs vs oxycodone. For the overall population included in the clinical trials, mean annual costs per patient when treated with tapentadol and oxycodone were £3543 and £3656, respectively. Treatment with tapentadol, while cheaper than oxycodone, was more effective (0.6371 vs 0.6237 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for tapentadol and oxycodone, respectively), meaning that tapentadol dominated oxycodone. For the sub-group of opioid-experienced patients with severe pain at baseline the ranking in terms of costs and QALYs remained unchanged. Extensive sensitivity analyses showed that conclusions about the cost-effectiveness are consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness study suggested that initiating 2nd line treatment in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain in the UK with tapentadol instead of oxycodone improves patients' quality-of-life and is less costly. Key limitations when interpreting the results are the use of different sources to populate the model and restricted generalizability due to data extrapolation.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在评估曲马多控释片(tapentadol prolonged release,PR)与羟考酮控释片(oxycodone controlled release,CR)相比,用于治疗对控释吗啡无效或不耐受的严重非恶性慢性疼痛患者的成本效果。

方法

采用 Markov 模型,从英国国家卫生服务体系(National Health Service,NHS)的角度,评估了 1 年时间内的成本和效益。由于疗效不佳或耐受性差,患者可以继续接受二线治疗或转为三线阿片类药物治疗。三线治疗失败的患者也进入最终吸收健康状态(四线)。曲马多和羟考酮的疗效和效用数据来自三项比较性 III 期临床试验。与阿片类药物治疗相关的资源消耗成本来源于对匿名患者记录的回顾性数据库分析。

结果

模型结果预测,与羟考酮相比,二线治疗起始时使用曲马多可提高疗效并降低成本。在纳入临床试验的总体人群中,接受曲马多和羟考酮治疗的患者每年的平均治疗费用分别为 3543 英镑和 3656 英镑。曲马多的治疗费用低于羟考酮,但更有效(分别为 0.6371 和 0.6237 个质量调整生命年[quality-adjusted life years,QALYs]),这意味着曲马多优于羟考酮。对于基线时疼痛严重的阿片类药物经验丰富的亚组患者,成本和 QALYs 的排名保持不变。广泛的敏感性分析表明,关于成本效果的结论是一致的。

结论

成本效果研究表明,在英国,对于严重非恶性慢性疼痛的患者,使用曲马多而不是羟考酮作为二线治疗,可提高患者的生活质量,同时降低成本。解释结果时的主要限制因素是模型中使用了不同的数据源,以及由于数据外推而导致的通用性受限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验