• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃纤维复合桩核与锻造桩及铸造桩核用于根管治疗后牙齿修复效果的对照临床试验:一项5年随访研究

Controlled Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Glass Fiber Composite Cores Versus Wrought Posts and Cast Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

作者信息

Cloet Ellen, Debels Elke, Naert Ignace

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan/Feb;30(1):71-79. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4861.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.4861
PMID:28085986
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the 5-year outcomes of glass fiber composite with cast posts and cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 143 patients in need of 203 full ceramic restorations on endodontically treated teeth were included. After primary stratification based on the need for post or no post, teeth were randomly allotted to test group 1 (prefabricated glass fiber posts), 2 (custom-made glass fiber posts), or 3 (composite cores without posts). The control group was treated with gold alloy-based wrought posts and cast cores. Success (original present) and survival (present after intervention) probability lifetime curves, corrected for clustering, were drawn over the entire data set.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 5.8 years (range: 0.5 to 7.2 years). At 5 years, the success and survival probabilities were 85.2% and 91.5%, respectively. Lifetime curves did not show any significant differences between the test and control groups for success (P = .85) or survival (P = .57). Moreover, no significant differences for success or survival could be found among the four groups (the three test groups and the control group).

CONCLUSION

After 5 years of follow-up, cast gold and composite post-and-core systems on teeth with ceramic full restorations provided with a ferrule performed equally well.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较玻璃纤维复合材料与铸造桩核用于根管治疗后牙齿修复的5年疗效。

材料与方法

共纳入143例需要对根管治疗后的牙齿进行203颗全瓷修复的患者。在根据是否需要桩进行初步分层后,将牙齿随机分配至试验组1(预成玻璃纤维桩)、试验组2(定制玻璃纤维桩)或试验组3(无桩复合核)。对照组采用金合金锻造桩和铸造核进行治疗。针对整个数据集绘制了校正聚类后的成功(最初存在)和生存(干预后存在)概率寿命曲线。

结果

平均随访时间为5.8年(范围:0.5至7.2年)。5年时,成功概率和生存概率分别为85.2%和91.5%。寿命曲线显示试验组和对照组在成功(P = 0.85)或生存(P = 0.57)方面无显著差异。此外,四组(三个试验组和对照组)之间在成功或生存方面也未发现显著差异。

结论

经过5年的随访,对于进行了全瓷修复且带有箍的牙齿,铸造金桩核系统和复合桩核系统的疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Controlled Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Glass Fiber Composite Cores Versus Wrought Posts and Cast Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.玻璃纤维复合桩核与锻造桩及铸造桩核用于根管治疗后牙齿修复效果的对照临床试验:一项5年随访研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan/Feb;30(1):71-79. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4861.
2
An up to 3-Year Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Glass Fiber Posts and Composite Cores with Gold Alloy-Based Posts and Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.一项长达 3 年的对照临床试验,比较玻璃纤维桩和复合核与金合金基桩和核用于修复根管治疗后的牙齿的疗效。
Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul-Aug;24(4):363-72.
3
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.三种黏固剂黏固的玻璃纤维增强桩核和铸造金桩核修复的根管治疗后牙的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60352-2.
4
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.不同长度玻璃纤维桩修复后根管治疗牙的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
5
Clinical success of zirconium oxide posts with resin composite or glass-ceramic cores in endodontically treated teeth: a 4-year retrospective study.氧化锆桩联合树脂复合体或玻璃陶瓷核用于根管治疗后牙齿的临床成功率:一项4年的回顾性研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):524-8.
6
Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up.铸造金属桩与玻璃纤维桩:一项长达3年随访的随机对照试验。
J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):582-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage.采用锥形或平行边玻璃纤维桩及全瓷冠修复的上颌前牙根管治疗后的长期存活率。
J Dent. 2009 Feb;37(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
8
In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts.使用玻璃纤维桩和锆桩修复的牙髓治疗后前牙抗折性的体外评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Feb;97(2):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.008.
9
Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.不同桩核系统修复中度缺损的经根管治疗上颌切牙的存活率和抗折强度:一项体外研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):58-64.
10
Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss.刚性与弹性牙本质状根管桩——生物力学概念的临床验证:一项针对伴有严重硬组织丧失的根管治疗基牙的随机对照临床前期试验七年结果。
J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars in Children: Challenges and Optimal Timing.儿童第一恒磨牙受损的修复策略:挑战与最佳时机
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2025 Aug 8;23:435-446. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2175.
2
Advanced Material Strategy for Restoring Damaged Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Comprehensive Review.修复根管治疗后受损牙齿的先进材料策略:综述
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 28;17(15):3736. doi: 10.3390/ma17153736.
3
Is a Pre-Existent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Able to Detect Metal Dental Posts?
术前锥形束计算机断层扫描能否检测出金属牙桩?
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;12(7):229. doi: 10.3390/dj12070229.
4
Evaluation of Retentive Strength of 50 Endodontically-Treated Single-Rooted Mandibular Second Premolars Restored with Cast Post Cores Using 5 Common Luting (Cement) Agents.评价 50 颗用 5 种常见黏结(水泥)剂黏结的铸造桩核修复的下颌第二前磨牙根管治疗后单根牙的固位力。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 30;30:e944110. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944110.
5
The load capacity of maxillary central incisor with simulated flared root canal restored with different fiber-reinforced composite post and cementation protocols.不同纤维增强复合材料桩和粘结方案修复具有模拟喇叭形根管的上颌中切牙的承载能力。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 17;11:e16469. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16469. eCollection 2023.
6
Current Insights on Fiber Posts: A Narrative Review of Laboratory and Clinical Studies.纤维桩的当前见解:实验室与临床研究的叙述性综述
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;11(10):236. doi: 10.3390/dj11100236.
7
Fibre-reinforced Cad/CAM post and cores: The new "gold standard" for anterior teeth with extensive coronal destruction?-A fully digital chairside workflow.纤维增强型计算机辅助设计与制造桩核:广泛冠部破坏的前牙的新“金标准”?——一种完全数字化的椅旁工作流程。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9;9(8):e19048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19048. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Dental Fiber-Post Systems: An In-Depth Review of Their Evolution, Current Practice and Future Directions.牙科纤维桩系统:对其演变、当前应用及未来发展方向的深入综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 May 4;10(5):551. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050551.
9
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restored with Different Post Systems.非龋性颈病变上颌前磨牙根管治疗后用不同桩系统修复的抗折能力。
Eur Endod J. 2023 Jan;8(1):65-71. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.96720.
10
Influence of presence or absence of posts on the failure rates of post endodontic restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.有无桩对桩后修复体失败率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Apr-Jun;22(2):122-130. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_315_21.