Rajan Shahzleen, Folke Fredrik, Hansen Steen Møller, Hansen Carolina Malta, Kragholm Kristian, Gerds Thomas A, Lippert Freddy K, Karlsson Lena, Møller Sidsel, Køber Lars, Gislason Gunnar H, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Wissenberg Mads
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Denmark; Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Resuscitation. 2017 May;114:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Knowledge about heart rhythm conversion from non-shockable to shockable rhythm during resuscitation attempt after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and following chance of survival is limited and inconsistent.
We studied 13,860 patients with presumed cardiac-caused OHCA not witnessed by the emergency medical services from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Register (2005-2012). Patients were stratified according to rhythm: shockable, converted shockable (based on receipt of subsequent defibrillation) and sustained non-shockable rhythm. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of rhythm conversion and to compute 30-day survival chances.
Twenty-five percent of patients who received pre-hospital defibrillation by ambulance personnel were initially found in non-shockable rhythms. Younger age, males, witnessed arrest, shorter response time, and heart disease were significantly associated with conversion to shockable rhythm, while psychiatric- and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly associated with sustained non-shockable rhythm. Compared to sustained non-shockable rhythms, converted shockable rhythms and initial shockable rhythms were significantly associated with increased 30-day survival (Adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-3.8; and OR 16.4, 95% CI 12.7-21.2, respectively). From 2005 to 2012, 30-day survival chances increased significantly for all three groups: shockable rhythms, from 16.3% (CI: 14.2%-18.7%) to 35.7% (CI: 32.5%-38.9%); converted rhythms, from 2.1% (CI: 1.6%-2.9%) to 5.8% (CI: 4.4%-7.6%); and sustained non-shockable rhythms, from 0.6% (CI: 0.5%-0.8%) to 1.8% (CI: 1.4%-2.2%).
Converting to shockable rhythm during resuscitation attempt was common and associated with nearly a three-fold higher odds of 30-day survival compared to sustained non-shockable rhythms.
关于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏尝试期间心律从不可电击心律转换为可电击心律以及后续生存机会的知识有限且不一致。
我们研究了丹麦心脏骤停登记处(2005 - 2012年)中13860例由假定心脏原因导致的、未被紧急医疗服务人员目击的OHCA患者。患者根据心律分层:可电击心律、转换为可电击心律(基于随后接受除颤)和持续性不可电击心律。采用多因素逻辑回归来确定心律转换的预测因素并计算30天生存机会。
25%接受急救人员院前除颤的患者最初被发现为不可电击心律。年龄较小、男性、目击骤停、较短的反应时间和心脏病与转换为可电击心律显著相关,而精神疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病与持续性不可电击心律显著相关。与持续性不可电击心律相比,转换为可电击心律和初始可电击心律与30天生存率增加显著相关(校正比值比(OR)分别为2.6,95%置信区间(CI):1.8 - 3.8;以及OR 16.4,95% CI 12.7 - 21.2)。从2005年到2012年,所有三组的30天生存机会均显著增加:可电击心律组,从16.3%(CI:14.2% - 18.7%)增至35.7%(CI:32.5% - 38.9%);转换心律组,从2.1%(CI:1.6% - 2.9%)增至5.8%(CI:4.4% - 7.6%);持续性不可电击心律组,从0.6%(CI:0.5% - 0.8%)增至1.8%(CI:1.4% - 2.2%)。
在复苏尝试期间转换为可电击心律很常见,与持续性不可电击心律相比,30天生存几率高出近三倍。