Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
White matter development during childhood and adolescence is characterised by increasing white matter coherence and organisation. Commonly used scalar metrics, such as fractional anisotropy (FA), are sensitive to multiple mechanisms of white matter change and therefore unable to distinguish between mechanisms that change during development. We investigate the relationship between age and neurite density index (NDI) from neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and the age-classification accuracy of NDI compared with FA, in a developmental cohort.
Diffusion-weighted imaging data from 72 children and adolescents between the ages of 4-19 was collected (M=10.42, SD=3.99, 36 male). We compared NODDI metrics against conventional DTI metrics (fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], axial diffusivity [AD] and radial diffusivity [RD]) in terms of their relationship to age. An ROC analysis was also performed to assess the ability of each metric to classify older and younger participants.
NDI exhibited a stronger relationship with age (median R=.60) compared with MD (median R=.39), FA (median R=.27), AD (median R=.14), and RD (median R=.35) in a high proportion of white matter tracts. When participants were divided into an older and younger group, NDI achieved the best classification (median area under the curve [AUC]=.89), followed by MD (median AUC=.81), FA (median AUC=.80), RD (median AUC=.81), and AD (median AUC=.64).
Our results demonstrate the sensitivity of NDI to age-related differences in white matter microstructural organisation over development. Importantly, NDI is more sensitive to such developmental changes compared to commonly used DTI metrics. This knowledge provides justification for implementing NODDI metrics in developmental studies.
儿童和青少年时期的白质发育的特点是白质连贯性和组织性增加。常用的标量指标,如各向异性分数(FA),对白质变化的多种机制敏感,因此无法区分在发育过程中发生变化的机制。我们研究了神经丝取向分散和密度成像(NODDI)中的神经丝密度指数(NDI)与年龄之间的关系,以及与 FA 相比,NDI 在发育队列中的年龄分类准确性。
收集了 72 名 4-19 岁儿童和青少年的弥散加权成像数据(M=10.42,SD=3.99,36 名男性)。我们比较了 NODDI 指标与传统的 DTI 指标(各向异性分数[FA]、平均扩散系数[MD]、轴向扩散系数[AD]和径向扩散系数[RD])在与年龄的关系方面的差异。还进行了 ROC 分析,以评估每个指标对分类较年长和较年轻参与者的能力。
在很大一部分白质束中,NDI 与年龄的关系(中位数 R=.60)强于 MD(中位数 R=.39)、FA(中位数 R=.27)、AD(中位数 R=.14)和 RD(中位数 R=.35)。当参与者被分为较年长和较年轻的组时,NDI 实现了最佳分类(中位数 AUC=.89),其次是 MD(中位数 AUC=.81)、FA(中位数 AUC=.80)、RD(中位数 AUC=.81)和 AD(中位数 AUC=.64)。
我们的结果表明,NDI 对白质微观结构组织在发育过程中的年龄相关差异具有敏感性。重要的是,与常用的 DTI 指标相比,NDI 对这种发育变化更为敏感。这一知识为在发育研究中实施 NODDI 指标提供了依据。