Suppr超能文献

三款听力计耳机的噪声衰减比较,以及阈附近掩蔽的附加数据。

Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.

作者信息

Berger E H, Killion M C

机构信息

E-A-R Division, Cabot Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-0898.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Oct;86(4):1392-403. doi: 10.1121/1.398699.

Abstract

The noise-excluding properties of a standard supra-aural audiometric earphone, a widely used circumaural-supra-aural combination, and an insert earphone sealed to the ear with a vinyl foam eartip were measured in a diffuse-field room complying with ANSI S12.6-1984. Data on attenuation were obtained monaurally with the nontest ear plugged and muffed. Results for the supra-aural earphones generally agreed well with previously reported measurements. A broadband masking noise was used to directly test the ANSI S3.1-1977 permissible background noise levels for measuring to audiometric zero using standard audiometric earphones. This "ANSI noise" raised the average thresholds of 15 normal-hearing test subjects by 3 to 5 dB at the octave frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz. With a noise conforming to the less stringent OSHA-1983 regulation, average thresholds were elevated 9 to 17 dB. An "ENT office noise" with an overall sound level of 54 dBA raised average thresholds even further, by as much as 29 dB at 500 Hz. Use of the circumaural system in the office noise limited the threshold elevation to 11, 5, 2, and 0 dB at the four octave frequencies tested. With the fully ("deeply") inserted foam eartips, the threshold elevation in the simulated office noise was 2 dB or less at all test frequencies. Actual threshold elevations agreed closely with predictions based on a critical ratio calculation utilizing measured sound field noise levels and measured earphone attenuation values.

摘要

在符合ANSI S12.6 - 1984标准的扩散场房间中,测量了标准耳挂式听力计耳机、广泛使用的耳罩 - 耳挂组合以及使用乙烯基泡沫耳塞密封到耳朵的插入式耳机的隔音性能。在非测试耳堵塞并 muffed 的情况下,单耳获得衰减数据。耳挂式耳机的结果与先前报告的测量结果总体上非常吻合。使用宽带掩蔽噪声直接测试了ANSI S3.1 - 1977中使用标准听力计耳机测量听力零级时允许的背景噪声水平。这种“ANSI噪声”在500至4000 Hz的倍频程频率下,使15名正常听力测试对象的平均阈值提高了3至5 dB。对于符合不太严格的OSHA - 1983规定的噪声,平均阈值提高了9至17 dB。总体声级为54 dBA的“耳鼻喉科办公室噪声”甚至进一步提高了平均阈值,在500 Hz时高达29 dB。在办公室噪声中使用耳罩式系统,在测试的四个倍频程频率下,阈值升高限制在11、5、2和0 dB。使用完全(“深度”)插入的泡沫耳塞,在所有测试频率下,模拟办公室噪声中的阈值升高为2 dB或更低。实际阈值升高与基于利用测量的声场噪声水平和测量的耳机衰减值进行的临界比计算的预测非常接近。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.两种环式耳机在测听中的评估。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):177-183. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000585.
5
Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.环境噪声监测在纯音测听中的应用。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2022 Jan;33(1):45-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735803. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Remote Categorical Loudness Scaling.远程类别响度评定评估。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Mar 3;31(1):45-56. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00099. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
2
Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry.在行业中实现听力测试的无线化和无 booth 化。
Int J Audiol. 2017;56(sup1):41-51. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1261189. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验