• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症和髋臼盂唇撕裂后的制动反应时间

Brake Reaction Time After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tear.

作者信息

Vera Angelina M, Beauchman Naseem, McCulloch Patrick C, Gerrie Brayden J, Delgado Domenica A, Harris Joshua D

机构信息

Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):971-976. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.020
PMID:28089193
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if a difference exists in brake reaction time (BRT) before and after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tear compared with age- and gender-matched controls.

METHODS

Consecutive adult subjects undergoing primary hip arthroscopy were eligible for this prospective investigation. Individuals with symptomatic FAI and labral tear that underwent hip arthroscopy with minimum 8 weeks follow-up were included. BRT was measured using the RT-2S reaction time tester a maximum of 6 weeks preoperatively and every 2 weeks postoperatively for 8 weeks. Sit-to-stand test (STST) was measured at each BRT testing session. An age- and gender-matched control group without hip or lower extremity symptoms were selected and completed both BRT and STST. Continuous pre- and postoperative BRT values were compared with Mann-Whitney and analyses of variance. Association of BRT and STST tests was performed with Spearman correlation. An a priori sample size calculation determined that minimally 18 subjects per group (surgery group vs control group) were necessary to detect, with 80% power (difference of 0.2 seconds in BRT).

RESULTS

Nineteen subjects (age 37.1 ± 12.7 years, 10 women, 11 right hip) were analyzed. All subjects underwent arthroscopic labral repair and FAI correction. There was no difference between preoperative (604 ± 148 milliseconds [ms]) and postoperative (608 ms 2 weeks; 566 ms 4 weeks; 559 ms 6 weeks; 595 ms 8 weeks) BRT. There was no difference between controls and subjects at any time point. There was a strong negative correlation between BRT and STST preoperatively and at 4 and 6 weeks postoperatively and a moderate negative correlation at 2 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

After hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tear, BRT is not different from preoperative values or that of controls. In addition, BRT had a significant correlation with STST in the first 6 weeks after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic, prospective.

摘要

目的

确定与年龄和性别匹配的对照组相比,股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)和髋臼唇盂缘撕裂患者在髋关节镜检查前后的制动反应时间(BRT)是否存在差异。

方法

连续接受初次髋关节镜检查的成年受试者符合本前瞻性研究的条件。纳入有症状的FAI和髋臼唇盂缘撕裂且接受髋关节镜检查并至少随访8周的个体。术前最多6周以及术后8周内每2周使用RT - 2S反应时间测试仪测量BRT。在每次BRT测试时测量坐立试验(STST)。选择年龄和性别匹配且无髋关节或下肢症状的对照组,并完成BRT和STST测试。术前和术后连续的BRT值采用Mann - Whitney检验和方差分析进行比较。BRT和STST测试之间的相关性采用Spearman相关性分析。预先进行的样本量计算确定,每组(手术组与对照组)至少需要18名受试者才能以80%的检验效能(BRT差异为0.2秒)检测到差异。

结果

分析了19名受试者(年龄37.1±12.7岁,10名女性,11例右髋)。所有受试者均接受了关节镜下髋臼唇盂缘修复和FAI矫正。术前(604±148毫秒[ms])和术后(2周时608 ms;4周时566 ms;6周时559 ms;8周时595 ms)的BRT无差异。在任何时间点,对照组和受试者之间均无差异。术前以及术后4周和6周时BRT与STST之间存在强负相关,术后2周时存在中度负相关。

结论

对于FAI和髋臼唇盂缘撕裂患者,髋关节镜检查后BRT与术前值或对照组无差异。此外,术后前6周BRT与STST有显著相关性。

证据水平

II级,诊断性、前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Brake Reaction Time After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tear.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症和髋臼盂唇撕裂后的制动反应时间
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):971-976. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Reaction Time and Brake Pedal Depression Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery: A Prospective Case-Control Study.关节镜髋关节手术后的反应时间和制动踏板压力:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1463-1470.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
3
Arthroscopic labral repair versus selective labral debridement in female patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective randomized study.关节镜下盂唇修复与选择性盂唇清创术治疗女性股骨髋臼撞击综合征:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.011.
4
Outcomes After Labral Repair in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia.股骨髋臼撞击症合并临界发育不良患者盂唇修复后的疗效
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Arthroscopic labral repair versus labral debridement in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a minimum 2.5 year follow-up study.髋关节镜下髋臼盂唇修复术与髋臼盂唇清创术治疗股骨髋臼撞击症患者的疗效比较:一项至少随访2.5年的研究
Hip Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):20-4. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000290. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
6
Survivorship and Outcomes 10 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Labral Debridement Compared with Labral Repair.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症10年后的生存情况及预后:盂唇清创术与盂唇修复术的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):997-1004. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01060.
7
Time taken to resume driving following hip arthroscopy.髋关节镜检查后恢复驾驶所需的时间。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 30;21(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03662-y.
8
Driving performance and turning reaction time following hip arthroscopy for FAIS: does capsular repair matter?髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)后的驾驶性能和转向反应时间:关节囊修复重要吗?
Hip Int. 2023 Jan;33(1):112-118. doi: 10.1177/11207000211006778. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
Arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction with a gracilis autograft versus labral refixation: 2-year minimum outcomes.关节镜下髋关节盂唇重建与盂唇修复固定术:2 年最低随访结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):980-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482884. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients With Tönnis Grade 1 Osteoarthritis at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up: A Matched-Pair Comparison With a Tönnis Grade 0 Control Group.最低5年随访的Tönnis 1级骨关节炎患者髋关节镜手术的结果:与Tönnis 0级对照组的配对比较
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;45(10):2294-2302. doi: 10.1177/0363546517706957. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
[Ability to drive after surgery and trauma to the lower limb : When can I drive again?].[下肢手术后及创伤后的驾驶能力:我何时可以再次驾驶?]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04671-2.
2
Return to Driving After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.髋关节镜检查后恢复驾驶:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Nov 30;10(11):23259671221128281. doi: 10.1177/23259671221128281. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Patients Generally May Return to Driving 4 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy and 6 Weeks After Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
髋关节镜检查后4周、膝关节镜检查后6周患者一般可恢复驾驶:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct 6;3(6):e2067-e2092. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.015. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Time taken to resume driving following hip arthroscopy.髋关节镜检查后恢复驾驶所需的时间。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 30;21(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03662-y.
5
Quality Assessment of Prospective Cohort Studies Evaluating Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.评估关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的前瞻性队列研究的质量评估:一项系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 8;7(5):2325967119838533. doi: 10.1177/2325967119838533. eCollection 2019 May.
6
[Evaluation of driving fitness in patients with musculoskeletal disorders : A systematic review].[肌肉骨骼疾病患者驾驶适宜性评估:一项系统评价]
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Sep;122(9):697-705. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0571-y.