• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持消费者与开处方者互动之外的共同决策:共同基础保真度量表的初步开发。

Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale.

作者信息

Fukui Sadaaki, Salyers Michelle P, Rapp Charlie, Goscha Rick, Young Leslie, Mabry Ally

机构信息

Director of Research, Center for Mental Health Research and Innovation, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, 1315 Wakarusa Dr., Lawrence, KS 66049, U.S.A; TEL: 785-864-5874; FAX: 785-864-5277.

Professor of Psychology and Director of the Clinical Psychology Program, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI); Co-Director of the ACT Center of Indiana, U.S.A. TEL: 317-274-2904.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2016;19(3):252-267. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864
PMID:28090194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5223273/
Abstract

Shared decision-making has become a central tenet of recovery-oriented, person-centered mental health care, yet the practice is not always transferred to the routine psychiatric visit. Supporting the practice at the system level, beyond the interactions of consumers and medication prescribers, is needed for successful adoption of shared decision-making. CommonGround is a systemic approach, intended to be part of a larger integration of shared decision-making tools and practices at the system level. We discuss the organizational components that CommonGround uses to facilitate shared decision-making, and we present a fidelity scale to assess how well the system is being implemented.

摘要

共同决策已成为以康复为导向、以人为本的精神卫生保健的核心原则,但这种做法并不总是能转化为常规的精神科就诊。要成功采用共同决策,需要在系统层面而非仅在消费者与药物开方者的互动层面支持这种做法。“共同基础”是一种系统方法,旨在成为系统层面共同决策工具和做法更大整合的一部分。我们讨论了“共同基础”用于促进共同决策的组织组成部分,并提出了一个保真度量表来评估该系统的实施效果。

相似文献

1
Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale.支持消费者与开处方者互动之外的共同决策:共同基础保真度量表的初步开发。
Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2016;19(3):252-267. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
2
Consumer Outcomes After Implementing CommonGround as an Approach to Shared Decision Making.将“共同基础”作为共享决策方法实施后的消费者结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Mar 1;68(3):299-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500468. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Implementing CommonGround in a community mental health center: Lessons in a computerized decision support system.在社区心理健康中心实施“共同基础”:计算机化决策支持系统的经验教训。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Sep;41(3):216-223. doi: 10.1037/prj0000225. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Use of a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Program: Impact on Ongoing Treatment Engagement and Antipsychotic Adherence.使用基于网络的共享决策程序:对持续治疗参与和抗精神病药物依从性的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800130. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Implementation and Use of a Client-Facing Web-Based Shared Decision-Making System (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) in Two Specialty Mental Health Clinics.在两家精神科专科诊所实施和使用面向患者的基于网络的共同决策支持系统(MyCHOIS-CommonGround)。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):641-650. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0341-x. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
6
A web application to support recovery and shared decision making in psychiatric medication clinics.一个用于支持精神科药物治疗诊所康复和共享决策的网络应用程序。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Summer;34(1):23-8. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.23.28.
7
Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.精神卫生保健中的共享决策和跨专业合作的多重视角。
J Interprof Care. 2013 May;27(3):223-30. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.767225. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
8
Consumer and relationship factors associated with shared decision making in mental health consultations.与心理健康咨询中共同决策相关的消费者和关系因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1488-91. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300563.
9
Efficacy of a Peer-Led, Recovery-Oriented Shared Decision-Making System: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.同伴主导、以康复为导向的共享决策系统的疗效:一项试点随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Dec 1;68(12):1307-1311. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600544. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness.公共精神卫生保健中的共享决策:来自患有严重精神疾病的消费者的观点。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Summer;34(1):29-36. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.29.36.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences of Information Dissemination on Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: Patient-Centered Focus Group Study.双相情感障碍治疗信息传播偏好:以患者为中心的焦点小组研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jun 25;6(6):e12848. doi: 10.2196/12848.
2
Consumer Outcomes After Implementing CommonGround as an Approach to Shared Decision Making.将“共同基础”作为共享决策方法实施后的消费者结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Mar 1;68(3):299-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500468. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Implementing CommonGround in a community mental health center: Lessons in a computerized decision support system.在社区心理健康中心实施“共同基础”:计算机化决策支持系统的经验教训。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Sep;41(3):216-223. doi: 10.1037/prj0000225. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting shared decision making for individuals with severe mental illness.为重症精神疾病患者调整共同决策模式。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1483-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400307.
2
Twelve myths about shared decision making.关于共同决策的十二个误区。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Exploring the experiences of client involvement in medication decisions using a shared decision making model: results of a qualitative study.运用共享决策模型探索患者参与用药决策的经历:一项定性研究的结果
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Apr;51(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9759-y. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
4
Challenges of implementing a medication management evidence-based practice in a community mental health setting: results of a qualitative study.在社区心理健康环境中实施基于证据的药物管理实践面临的挑战:一项定性研究的结果
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jul;35(7):517-25. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.888601.
5
Enhanced consumer goal achievement through strengths-based group supervision.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Sep;38(3):268-72. doi: 10.1037/prj0000060. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
Activation, self-management, engagement, and retention in behavioral health care: a randomized clinical trial of the DECIDE intervention.行为健康护理中的激活、自我管理、参与和保持:DECIDE 干预的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):557-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4519.
7
Trends and perspectives of shared decision-making in schizophrenia and related disorders.精神分裂症及相关障碍中共同决策的趋势与展望
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 May;27(3):222-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000057.
8
Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence.为严重精神疾病患者提供的同伴支持服务:评估证据
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):429-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300244.
9
Core domains of shared decision-making during psychiatric visits: scientific and preference-based discussions.精神科就诊期间共同决策的核心领域:基于科学和偏好的讨论。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Jan;42(1):40-6. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0539-3.
10
Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems.利用和滥用康复:在精神卫生系统中实施以康复为导向的实践。
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20. doi: 10.1002/wps.20084.