Gall Henning, Preston Ioana R, Hinzmann Barbara, Heinz Sabina, Jenkins David, Kim Nick H, Lang Irene
University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Giessen, member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Division, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pulm Circ. 2016 Dec;6(4):472-482. doi: 10.1086/688084.
We conducted an international study to evaluate practices in the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) globally across different regions. Between August and October 2012, CTEPH-treating physicians completed a 15-minute online questionnaire and provided patient record data for their 2-5 most recent patients with CTEPH. Overall, 496 physicians (Europe: 260; United States: 152; Argentina: 52; Japan: 32) completed the questionnaire and provided patient record data for 1,748 patients. The proportion of physicians who described themselves as working in or affiliated with a specialized pulmonary hypertension (PH) center ranged from 38% in France and Italy to 83% in the United States. A large proportion of patients did not undergo ventilation/perfusion scanning (46%-67%) or right heart catheterization (24%-57%) for the diagnosis of CTEPH. Referral rates for pulmonary endarterectomy evaluation ranged from 25% in Japan to 44% in Europe, with higher referral rates in PH centers; the main reasons for lack of referral were that surgery was not considered unless medical treatment was failing and patient refusal. Other variations in management included greater use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in the United States than in Europe and Japan and greater use of combination treatment in the United States than in Europe. Physicians' perceptions of their treatment strategy were generally consistent with patient record data. Results from this study, which includes a global aspect of CTEPH care, demonstrate not only regional differences in CTEPH management but, more importantly, considerable nonadherence to the diagnosis and treatment guidelines for CTEPH, even in PH centers.
我们开展了一项国际研究,以评估全球不同地区慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者的诊断和管理实践。2012年8月至10月期间,治疗CTEPH的医生完成了一份15分钟的在线问卷,并提供了他们最近2 - 5例CTEPH患者的病历数据。总体而言,496名医生(欧洲:260名;美国:152名;阿根廷:52名;日本:32名)完成了问卷,并提供了1748例患者的病历数据。将自己描述为在专门的肺动脉高压(PH)中心工作或与之相关的医生比例,在法国和意大利为38%,在美国为83%。很大一部分患者在诊断CTEPH时未进行通气/灌注扫描(46% - 67%)或右心导管检查(24% - 57%)。肺动脉内膜剥脱术评估的转诊率在日本为25%,在欧洲为44%,在PH中心转诊率更高;缺乏转诊的主要原因是除非药物治疗无效否则不考虑手术以及患者拒绝。管理方面的其他差异包括美国比欧洲和日本更多地使用磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂,以及美国比欧洲更多地使用联合治疗。医生对其治疗策略的看法总体上与患者病历数据一致。这项涵盖CTEPH护理全球情况的研究结果表明,不仅CTEPH管理存在地区差异,更重要的是,即使在PH中心,也存在相当程度的不遵守CTEPH诊断和治疗指南的情况。