Cheson Bruce D, Kostakoglu Lale
Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Jan 15;31(1):71-76.
In Part 1, we reviewed the role of interim positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans in Hodgkin lymphoma. In advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, interim PET is a useful prognostic tool that can be used to implement risk-adapted therapy with potential benefits for both patients who have negative interim scans and those whose scans are positive. Interim PET/CT has not shown as encouraging results in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with the exception of germinal center B-cell DLBCL. Thus, quantitative methods of interpreting interim PET scans have been pursued in an effort to improve their predictive value. Early results using the change in maximal standardized uptake value between baseline and interim PET (ΔSUVmax) to quantitatively interpret interim PET scans in DLBCL patients showed promise, but later results were contradictory. Thus, there is not firm evidence of a prognostic value for interim PET interpreted using either visual or ΔSUVmax-based analysis in patients with DLBCL. Nor are there data to support altering treatment in DLBCL on the basis of an interim PET scan. More sophisticated methods of quantitative interpretation of interim PET, using metabolic tumor volume and tumor lesion glycolysis measurements, have been investigated in both Hodgkin lymphoma and DLBCL. Although to date studies of these approaches have been small and heterogeneous, they do provide some support for the potential of a PET-derived volumetric approach to discriminate between risk groups better than ΔSUVmax; this remains to be proven in well-designed large-scale studies.
在第1部分中,我们回顾了中期正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)在霍奇金淋巴瘤中的作用。在晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤中,中期PET是一种有用的预后工具,可用于实施风险适应性治疗,对中期扫描阴性的患者和扫描阳性的患者都可能有益。除生发中心B细胞弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)外,中期PET/CT在DLBCL中并未显示出令人鼓舞的结果。因此,人们一直在探索解释中期PET扫描的定量方法,以提高其预测价值。早期使用基线和中期PET之间最大标准化摄取值的变化(ΔSUVmax)对DLBCL患者的中期PET扫描进行定量解释的结果显示出前景,但后来的结果相互矛盾。因此,没有确凿证据表明在DLBCL患者中,使用视觉分析或基于ΔSUVmax的分析对中期PET进行预后评估有价值。也没有数据支持根据中期PET扫描改变DLBCL的治疗方案。在霍奇金淋巴瘤和DLBCL中都研究了使用代谢肿瘤体积和肿瘤病变糖酵解测量对中期PET进行更复杂的定量解释方法。尽管迄今为止对这些方法的研究规模较小且存在异质性,但它们确实为PET衍生的体积测量方法比ΔSUVmax更好地区分风险组的潜力提供了一些支持;这仍有待在精心设计的大规模研究中得到证实。