Lohela T J, Chase R P, Hiekkanen T A, Kontinen V K, Hynynen M J
Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Mar;61(3):300-308. doi: 10.1111/aas.12852. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
Peripheral nerve blocks could reduce the operating unit and theatre time spent on high-risk patients who are particularly vulnerable to complications of general anaesthesia or have medications that prevent application of central neuraxial blocks.
Medical record data of 617 and 254 elderly adults undergoing below-knee surgery in Jorvi and Meilahti hospitals (Helsinki University Hospital) between January 2010 and December 2012 were used to investigate the influence of anaesthetic technique on operating theatre times and on operating unit times using flexible parametric survival models. We report operating theatre and unit exit ratios (i.e. hazard ratios but using ratios of exit rates) for different types of anaesthesia.
Adjusted analyses: In Jorvi Hospital, anaesthesia type was associated with large initial differentials in operating theatre times. The theatre exit ratios remained lower for general anaesthesia and central neuraxial blocks compared to peripheral nerve blocks until 30 min. In Meilahti Hospital, anaesthesia type did not influence theatre time, but was the best predictor of operating unit times. Compared to peripheral nerve blocks, the exit ratio remained lower for general anaesthesia until five operating unit hours in both hospitals and for central neuraxial blocks until 1 h in Meilahti Hospital and until 3 h in Jorvi Hospital. Holding area was used more in Jorvi Hospital compared to Meilahti Hospital.
Peripheral nerve block anaesthesia reduces time spent in the operating unit and can reduce time spent in the operating theatre if induced in holding area outside of theatre.
周围神经阻滞可减少用于高危患者的手术单元和手术时间,这些患者特别容易发生全身麻醉并发症或有妨碍应用中枢神经轴索阻滞的药物。
利用2010年1月至2012年12月期间在约尔维医院和梅拉hti医院(赫尔辛基大学医院)接受膝关节以下手术的617名和254名老年患者的病历数据,采用灵活的参数生存模型研究麻醉技术对手术时间和手术单元时间的影响。我们报告了不同类型麻醉的手术室和单元出院率(即风险比,但使用出院率之比)。
校正分析:在约尔维医院,麻醉类型与手术时间的初始差异较大有关。在30分钟之前,全身麻醉和中枢神经轴索阻滞的手术室出院率仍低于周围神经阻滞。在梅拉hti医院,麻醉类型不影响手术时间,但却是手术单元时间的最佳预测因素。与周围神经阻滞相比,在两家医院中,全身麻醉的出院率在5个手术单元小时之前均较低,在梅拉hti医院中枢神经轴索阻滞的出院率在1小时之前较低,在约尔维医院在3小时之前较低。与梅拉hti医院相比,约尔维医院更多地使用了等候区。
周围神经阻滞麻醉可减少在手术单元花费的时间,如果在手术室外的等候区诱导麻醉,还可减少在手术室花费的时间。