Lilienthal Lindsey
a Department of Psychology , Penn State Altoona , Altoona , PA , USA.
Memory. 2017 Sep;25(8):1110-1116. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1268633. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
Proactive interference (PI) has been shown to affect working memory (WM) span as well as the predictive utility of WM span measures. However, most of the research on PI has been conducted using verbal memory items, and much less is known about the role of PI in the visuospatial domain. In order to further explore this issue, the present study used a within-subjects manipulation of PI that alternated clusters of trials with verbal and visuospatial to-be-remembered items. Although PI was shown to build and release across trials similarly in the two domains, important differences also were observed. The ability of verbal WM to predict performance on a measure of fluid intelligence was significantly affected by the amount of PI present, consistent with past research, but this proved not to be the case for visuospatial WM. Further, individuals' susceptibility to PI in one domain was relatively independent of their susceptibility in the other domain, suggesting that, contrary to some theories of executive function, individual differences in PI susceptibility may not be domain-general.
前摄干扰(PI)已被证明会影响工作记忆(WM)广度以及WM广度测量的预测效用。然而,大多数关于PI的研究都是使用言语记忆项目进行的,而对于PI在视觉空间领域的作用了解得要少得多。为了进一步探讨这个问题,本研究采用了一种被试内PI操纵,将言语和视觉空间待记忆项目的试验组交替进行。尽管在两个领域中PI在各试验间的形成和消除方式相似,但也观察到了重要差异。言语WM预测流体智力测量表现的能力受到当前PI量的显著影响,这与过去的研究一致,但事实证明视觉空间WM并非如此。此外,个体在一个领域对PI的易感性相对独立于他们在另一个领域的易感性,这表明,与一些执行功能理论相反,PI易感性的个体差异可能并非跨领域普遍存在。