Terayama Takero, Yamakawa Kazuma, Umemura Yutaka, Aihara Morio, Fujimi Satoshi
1 Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center , Osaka, Japan .
2 Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center , Osaka, Japan .
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Apr;18(3):225-233. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.168. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber (PMX-DHP) therapy in patients with sepsis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of four major databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
Randomized controlled trials comparing PMX-DHP with conventional therapy on the outcome of mortality in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.
Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed quality, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were mortality and adverse events. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate quality of evidence and grade the strength of recommendation.
In seven trials enrolling 841 patients, assessment for risk of bias indicated variations in study quality from high (n = 4) to unclear (n = 3) resulting from a lack of adequate randomization, blinding, and incomplete outcomes. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber therapy was associated with lower mortality (risk ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.89; p = 0.007; I = 72%). Significant heterogeneity among trials was explained partly by study venue and baseline mortality rate. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant negative slope between effect size of PMX-DHP therapy and baseline mortality rate in individual studies (p = 0.003), suggesting the probability of a beneficial effect with PMX-DHP increased with increasing baseline risk. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber therapy did not increase the risk of hemoperfusion-related adverse events. The quality of the body of evidence was considered low for both mortality and adverse events.
Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber therapy was associated with reduced mortality in sepsis/septic shock. Based on the low quality of evidence, therapeutic use of PMX-DHP for survival benefit may be recommended conditionally for patients with high risk of death. Additional large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute this evidence.
评估多黏菌素B固定化纤维直接血液灌流(PMX-DHP)疗法治疗脓毒症患者的疗效和安全性。
对四个主要数据库进行系统评价和荟萃分析:Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、Scopus和科学引文索引扩展版。
比较PMX-DHP与传统疗法对严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者死亡率影响的随机对照试验。
两名研究者独立应用纳入标准、评估质量并提取数据。主要结局为死亡率和不良事件。我们采用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据质量进行评级并对推荐强度进行分级。
在纳入841例患者的7项试验中,偏倚风险评估表明,由于缺乏充分随机化、盲法和结局不完整,研究质量存在差异,从高质量(n = 4)到不明确(n = 3)。多黏菌素B固定化纤维疗法与较低死亡率相关(风险比,0.65;95%置信区间[CI],0.47 - 0.89;p = 0.007;I² = 72%)。试验间显著的异质性部分可由研究地点和基线死亡率解释。荟萃回归分析显示,在个体研究中,PMX-DHP疗法的效应大小与基线死亡率之间存在显著负斜率(p = 0.003),这表明随着基线风险增加,PMX-DHP产生有益效果的可能性增加。多黏菌素B固定化纤维疗法未增加血液灌流相关不良事件的风险。死亡率和不良事件的证据质量均被认为较低。
多黏菌素B固定化纤维疗法与脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者死亡率降低相关。基于证据质量较低,对于死亡风险高的患者,可能有条件地推荐使用PMX-DHP以获得生存益处。需要更多大型随机对照试验来证实或反驳这一证据。