Birmingham University Imaging Centre (BUIC), School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Birmingham University Imaging Centre (BUIC), School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; Laboratory of Electrophysiology for Translational Neuroscience (LET'S) - ISTC - CNR, Fatebenefratelli Hospital Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:330-342. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
A bilateral visuo-parietal-motor network is responsible for fine control of hand movements. However, the sub-regions which are devoted to maintenance of contraction stability and how these processes fluctuate with trial-quality of task execution and in the presence/absence of visual feedback remains unclear. We addressed this by integrating behavioural and fMRI measurements during right-hand isometric compression of a compliant rubber bulb, at 10% and 30% of maximum voluntary contraction, both with and without visual feedback of the applied force. We quantified single-trial behavioural performance during 1) the whole task period and 2) stable contraction maintenance, and regressed these metrics against the fMRI data to identify the brain activity most relevant to trial-by-trial fluctuations in performance during specific task phases. fMRI-behaviour correlations in a bilateral network of visual, premotor, primary motor, parietal and inferior frontal cortical regions emerged during performance of the entire feedback task, but only in premotor, parietal cortex and thalamus during the stable contraction period. The trials with the best task performance showed increased bilaterality and amplitude of fMRI responses. With feedback, stronger BOLD-behaviour coupling was found during 10% compared to 30% contractions. Only a small subset of regions in this network were weakly correlated with behaviour without feedback, despite wider network activated during this task than in the presence of feedback. These findings reflect a more focused network strongly coupled to behavioural fluctuations when providing visual feedback, whereas without it the task recruited widespread brain activity almost uncoupled from behavioural performance.
一个双侧视-顶-运动网络负责手部运动的精细控制。然而,负责维持收缩稳定性的子区域以及这些过程如何随任务执行质量的波动而波动,以及在存在/不存在视觉反馈的情况下如何波动,目前尚不清楚。我们通过在右手等长压缩一个顺应性橡胶球时整合行为和 fMRI 测量来解决这个问题,压缩程度分别为最大自主收缩的 10%和 30%,同时有和没有施加力的视觉反馈。我们在 1)整个任务期间和 2)稳定收缩维持期间量化了单次试验行为表现,并将这些指标与 fMRI 数据进行回归,以确定在特定任务阶段,与性能的单次试验波动最相关的大脑活动。在整个反馈任务期间,双侧视觉、运动前区、初级运动区、顶叶和下额叶皮质区域的网络中出现了 fMRI 与行为的相关性,但在稳定收缩期间仅出现在运动前区和顶叶皮层以及丘脑。表现最好的任务试验显示出 fMRI 反应的双侧性和振幅增加。有反馈时,10%的收缩比 30%的收缩时 BOLD 与行为的耦合更强。尽管在没有反馈的情况下,这个任务激活的网络比有反馈时更广泛,但这个网络中的一小部分区域与行为的相关性很弱。这些发现反映了一个更集中的网络,当提供视觉反馈时与行为波动强烈耦合,而没有反馈时,任务会招募与行为表现几乎不耦合的广泛大脑活动。