Donati Fabrizio, Myerson Saul, Bissell Malenka M, Smith Nicolas P, Neubauer Stefan, Monaghan Mark J, Nordsletten David A, Lamata Pablo
From the King's College London, Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas' Hospital, The Rayne Institute, United Kingdom (F.D., N.P.S., D.A.N., P.L.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (S.M., M.M.B., S.N.); University of Auckland, New Zealand (N.P.S.); and Department of Non Invasive Cardiology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom (M.J.M.).
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;10(1):e005207. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005207.
Transvalvular peak pressure drops are routinely assessed noninvasively by echocardiography using the Bernoulli principle. However, the Bernoulli principle relies on several approximations that may not be appropriate, including that the majority of the pressure drop is because of the spatial acceleration of the blood flow, and the ejection jet is a single streamline (single peak velocity value).
We assessed the accuracy of the Bernoulli principle to estimate the peak pressure drop at the aortic valve using 3-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow data in 32 subjects. Reference pressure drops were computed from the flow field, accounting for the principles of physics (ie, the Navier-Stokes equations). Analysis of the pressure components confirmed that the spatial acceleration of the blood jet through the valve is most significant (accounting for 99% of the total drop in stenotic subjects). However, the Bernoulli formulation demonstrated a consistent overestimation of the transvalvular pressure (average of 54%, range 5%-136%) resulting from the use of a single peak velocity value, which neglects the velocity distribution across the aortic valve plane. This assumption was a source of uncontrolled variability.
The application of the Bernoulli formulation results in a clinically significant overestimation of peak pressure drops because of approximation of blood flow as a single streamline. A corrected formulation that accounts for the cross-sectional profile of the blood flow is proposed and adapted to both cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic data.
跨瓣峰值压力阶差通常通过超声心动图利用伯努利原理进行无创评估。然而,伯努利原理依赖于几个可能并不合适的近似假设,包括大部分压力阶差是由于血流的空间加速度,以及射血血流是单一流线(单一峰值速度值)。
我们使用32名受试者的三维心血管磁共振血流数据评估了伯努利原理估计主动脉瓣峰值压力阶差的准确性。参考压力阶差根据流场计算得出,考虑了物理原理(即纳维-斯托克斯方程)。对压力分量的分析证实,血流通过瓣膜的空间加速度最为显著(在狭窄受试者中占总压力阶差的99%)。然而,由于使用单一峰值速度值而忽略了主动脉瓣平面上的速度分布,伯努利公式显示出对跨瓣压力的持续高估(平均高估54%,范围为5%-136%)。这一假设是变异性失控的一个来源。
由于将血流近似为单一流线,伯努利公式的应用导致峰值压力阶差在临床上被显著高估。我们提出了一种校正公式,该公式考虑了血流的横截面轮廓,并适用于心血管磁共振和超声心动图数据。