Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Servei d'Urgències, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):135-146. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30435-0. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza. However, there is an unmet need for intravenous treatment for patients admitted to hospital with severe influenza. We studied whether intravenous zanamivir was a suitable treatment in this setting.
In this international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 16 years or older with severe influenza admitted to 97 hospitals from 26 countries. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1 stratified by symptom onset ≤4 days or 5-6 days) to receive 300 mg or 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, or standard-of-care (75 mg oral oseltamivir) twice a day for 5-10 days; patients were followed up for 28 days. The randomisation schedule, including stratification, was generated using GlaxoSmithKline's RandAll software. Patients, site study staff, and sponsor were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response-a composite of vital sign stabilisation and hospital discharge-in the influenza-positive population. The trial was powered to show an improvement of 1·5 days or greater with 600 mg intravenous zanamivir. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and virology endpoints were also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01231620.
Between Jan 15, 2011, and Feb 12, 2015, 626 patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=201), 600 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=209), or 75 mg oral oseltamivir (n=205) twice a day; 11 patients discontinued the study before receiving any study treatment. 488 (78%) of 626 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza. Compared with a median time to clinical response of 5·14 days in the 600 mg intravenous zanamivir group, the median time to clinical response was 5·87 days (difference of -0·73 days, 95% CI -1·79 to 0·75; p=0·25) in the 300 mg intravenous zanamivir group and 5·63 days (difference of -0·48 days, 95% CI -2·11 to 0·97; p=0·39) in the oseltamivir group. Four patients with influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in the oseltamivir group developed H275Y resistance mutations. Adverse events were reported in 373 (61%) of treated patients and were similar across treatment groups; the most common adverse events (300 mg intravenous zanamivir, 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, oseltamivir) were diarrhoea (10 [5%], 15 [7%], 14 [7%]), respiratory failure (11 [5%], 14 [7%], 11 [5%]), and constipation (7 [3%], 13 [6%], 10 [5%]). 41 (7%) treated patients died during the study (15 [7%], 15 [7%], 11 [5%]); the most common causes of death were respiratory failure and septic shock.
Time to clinical response to intravenous zanamivir dosed at 600 mg was not superior to oseltamivir or 300 mg intravenous zanamivir. All treatments had a similar safety profile in hospitalised patients with severe influenza.
GlaxoSmithKline.
神经氨酸酶抑制剂对治疗急性单纯性流感有效。然而,对于因严重流感住院的患者,仍存在静脉治疗的需求。我们研究了静脉扎那米韦在这种情况下是否是一种合适的治疗方法。
这是一项国际性、随机、双盲、双模拟、3 期临床试验,我们招募了来自 26 个国家的 97 家医院因严重流感入院的 16 岁及以上的患者。我们将患者(根据症状出现≤4 天或 5-6 天分层)随机分配接受 300mg 或 600mg 静脉扎那米韦,或标准治疗(75mg 口服奥司他韦),每天两次,持续 5-10 天;患者随访 28 天。随机分组方案(包括分层)是由葛兰素史克公司的 RandAll 软件生成的。患者、现场研究人员和赞助商对研究治疗均不知情。主要终点是流感阳性人群中生命体征稳定和出院的临床反应时间(综合指标)。该试验有足够的效力显示 600mg 静脉扎那米韦组的改善时间为 1.5 天或更长。还评估了药代动力学、安全性和病毒学终点。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01231620。
2011 年 1 月 15 日至 2015 年 2 月 12 日,626 名患者被随机分配接受 300mg 静脉扎那米韦(n=201)、600mg 静脉扎那米韦(n=209)或 75mg 口服奥司他韦(n=205),每天两次;11 名患者在接受任何研究治疗前退出了研究。626 名患者中有 488 名(78%)有实验室确诊的流感。与 600mg 静脉扎那米韦组的中位临床反应时间 5.14 天相比,300mg 静脉扎那米韦组的中位临床反应时间为 5.87 天(差异为-0.73 天,95%CI-1.79 至 0.75;p=0.25),奥司他韦组的中位临床反应时间为 5.63 天(差异为-0.48 天,95%CI-2.11 至 0.97;p=0.39)。奥司他韦组的 4 名甲型 H1N1pdm09 流感患者出现了 H275Y 耐药突变。在接受治疗的患者中,373 名(61%)报告了不良事件,且各治疗组的不良事件相似;最常见的不良事件(300mg 静脉扎那米韦、600mg 静脉扎那米韦、奥司他韦)为腹泻(10[5%]、15[7%]、14[7%])、呼吸衰竭(11[5%]、14[7%]、11[5%])和便秘(7[3%]、13[6%]、10[5%])。在研究期间,41 名(7%)接受治疗的患者死亡(15[7%]、15[7%]、11[5%]);最常见的死亡原因是呼吸衰竭和感染性休克。
静脉扎那米韦 600mg 剂量的临床反应时间并不优于奥司他韦或 300mg 静脉扎那米韦。所有治疗方法在因严重流感住院的患者中均具有相似的安全性。
葛兰素史克公司。