Suppr超能文献

抗流感病毒药物治疗严重流感:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Lancet. 2024 Aug 24;404(10454):753-763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01307-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal antiviral drug for treatment of severe influenza remains unclear. To support updated WHO influenza clinical guidelines, this systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated antivirals for treatment of patients with severe influenza.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Global Health, Epistemonikos, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Sept 20, 2023, that enrolled hospitalised patients with suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza and compared direct-acting influenza antivirals against placebo, standard care, or another antiviral. Pairs of coauthors independently extracted data on study characteristics, patient characteristics, antiviral characteristics, and outcomes, with discrepancies resolved by discussion or by a third coauthor. Key outcomes of interest were time to alleviation of symptoms, duration of hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit, progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, hospital discharge destination, emergence of antiviral resistance, adverse events, adverse events related to treatments, and serious adverse events. We conducted frequentist network meta-analyses to summarise the evidence and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023456650.

FINDINGS

Of 11 878 records identified by our search, eight trials with 1424 participants (mean age 36-60 years for trials that reported mean or median age; 43-78% male patients) were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the network meta-analysis. The effects of oseltamivir, peramivir, or zanamivir on mortality compared with placebo or standard care without placebo for seasonal and zoonotic influenza were of very low certainty. Compared with placebo or standard care, we found low certainty evidence that duration of hospitalisation for seasonal influenza was reduced with oseltamivir (mean difference -1·63 days, 95% CI -2·81 to -0·45) and peramivir (-1·73 days, -3·33 to -0·13). Compared with standard care, there was little or no difference in time to alleviation of symptoms with oseltamivir (0·34 days, -0·86 to 1·54; low certainty evidence) or peramivir (-0·05 days, -0·69 to 0·59; low certainty evidence). There were no differences in adverse events or serious adverse events with oseltamivir, peramivir, and zanamivir (very low certainty evidence). Uncertainty remains about the effects of antivirals on other outcomes for patients with severe influenza. Due to the small number of eligible trials, we could not test for publication bias.

INTERPRETATION

In hospitalised patients with severe influenza, oseltamivir and peramivir might reduce duration of hospitalisation compared with standard care or placebo, although the certainty of evidence is low. The effects of all antivirals on mortality and other important patient outcomes are very uncertain due to scarce data from randomised controlled trials.

FUNDING

World Health Organization.

摘要

背景

治疗重症流感的最佳抗病毒药物仍不清楚。为了支持世界卫生组织更新的流感临床指南,本系统评价和网络荟萃分析评估了抗病毒药物治疗重症流感患者的效果。

方法

我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、护理学及相关健康专业文献累积索引、全球卫生、Epistemonikos 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以获取截至 2023 年 9 月 20 日发表的随机对照试验,这些试验纳入了疑似或实验室确诊流感的住院患者,并比较了直接作用的流感抗病毒药物与安慰剂、标准治疗或其他抗病毒药物的效果。两位合著者独立提取研究特征、患者特征、抗病毒药物特征和结局的数据,通过讨论或第三位合著者解决分歧。主要结局包括症状缓解时间、住院时间、入住重症监护病房、进展为有创机械通气、机械通气时间、死亡率、出院去向、抗病毒药物耐药性的出现、不良事件、与治疗相关的不良事件和严重不良事件。我们进行了频率论网络荟萃分析以总结证据,并使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价)方法评估证据的确定性。本研究在 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42023456650。

发现

通过我们的搜索共确定了 11878 条记录,其中 8 项试验(报告均数或中位数年龄的试验中,平均年龄为 36-60 岁;43-78%为男性患者)共纳入了 1424 名参与者,其中 6 项试验纳入了网络荟萃分析。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,奥司他韦、帕拉米韦或扎那米韦对季节性和动物源性流感死亡率的影响证据确定性为极低。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,我们发现奥司他韦(平均差-1.63 天,95%CI-2.81 至-0.45)和帕拉米韦(-1.73 天,-3.33 至-0.13)可降低季节性流感的住院时间,证据确定性为低。与标准治疗相比,奥司他韦(0.34 天,-0.86 至 1.54;低确定性证据)或帕拉米韦(-0.05 天,-0.69 至 0.59;低确定性证据)的症状缓解时间差异不大或无差异。奥司他韦、帕拉米韦和扎那米韦在不良事件或严重不良事件方面没有差异(极低确定性证据)。由于纳入的试验数量较少,我们无法对发表偏倚进行检验,因此仍不确定抗病毒药物对重症流感患者其他结局的影响。

解释

在重症流感住院患者中,与标准治疗或安慰剂相比,奥司他韦和帕拉米韦可能会缩短住院时间,尽管证据的确定性较低。由于随机对照试验的数据稀缺,所有抗病毒药物对死亡率和其他重要患者结局的影响都非常不确定。

资金

世界卫生组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1406/11369965/3ab14272d25f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验