Department of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA -
Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA -
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 May;83(5):465-473. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11610-4. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
There are limited reports of lumbar neuraxial blocks using real-time US in patients with predicted difficulties. We compared the number of attempts to perform spinal anesthesia using real-time US guidance versus landmark technique in patients meeting predefined criteria for difficult spinal anesthesia. We also compared procedure time, block success, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores between groups.
Following institutional review board approval patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty with expected difficulty to perform spinal anesthesia were included. Number of attempts, block time, success rate, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores were recorded and we conducted the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test of difference between the groups.
Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and a total of 32 data sets was analyzed. For number of attempts, we observed no difference between the groups (P<0.83). The US group resulted in marginally higher time to block compared to the control (P<0.0653). The US group resulted in marginally higher satisfaction compared to the control group (P<0.09). The block success rate was 100% in both groups. Anesthesiologists rated the US group procedure more difficult than the control group (χ2=10.85, P<0.0010).
This trial suggests that real-time US guidance for spinal anesthesia in challenging patients in comparison to the controlled group was completed in longer time, with lower needle insertion attempts, and higher patient satisfaction scores but without statistically significant differences.
在预测有困难的患者中,使用实时超声进行腰椎神经轴阻滞的报告有限。我们比较了使用实时超声引导与地标技术进行脊柱麻醉的尝试次数,这些患者符合脊柱麻醉困难的预设标准。我们还比较了两组之间的程序时间、阻滞成功率、患者满意度和难度评分。
在机构审查委员会批准后,我们纳入了预计进行脊柱麻醉困难的全髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者。记录了尝试次数、阻滞时间、成功率、患者满意度和难度评分,并对组间差异进行了 Kruskal-Wallis 非参数检验。
共纳入 38 例患者,分析了 32 组数据。在尝试次数方面,两组之间无差异(P<0.83)。与对照组相比,超声组的阻滞时间略长(P<0.0653)。与对照组相比,超声组的满意度略高(P<0.09)。两组的阻滞成功率均为 100%。麻醉医师认为超声组的操作比对照组更困难(χ2=10.85,P<0.0010)。
与对照组相比,实时超声引导在困难患者中进行脊柱麻醉的尝试时间更长,穿刺次数更少,患者满意度更高,但差异无统计学意义。