Ellsbury K E, Larson E B, Raskind W, Montano D E, Kuykendall D
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
J Fam Pract. 1989 Nov;29(5):546-52.
Traditional wisdom suggests that academic medical centers attract sicker patients than nonacademic facilities, thereby incurring greater risk when caring for patients enrolled in prepaid health care plans. This study examines the affiliation of an academic medical center with a prepaid capitation-based medical plan in western Washington state and focuses on demographic characteristics, prior existing medical conditions, recent utilization, and factors affecting enrollee choice of health care plan, clinic, and physician. It was hypothesized that university clinic enrollees would differ from nonuniversity clinic enrollees with regard to many of these factors. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 400 university clinic enrollees and 759 enrollees in nonuniversity, private practice settings. The response rate was 56.1%. Results showed that, when compared with nonuniversity clinic enrollees in the same plan, university clinic enrollees were significantly younger and had more formal education. University clinic enrollees reported less health care utilization and expressed fewer strong preferences than nonuniversity clinic enrollees in choosing a health care plan, clinic, and physician. Based on this survey, there was no evidence that the academic medical center attracted sicker HMO enrollees than did nonuniversity clinics.
传统观点认为,学术医疗中心比非学术机构吸引的患者病情更重,因此在照顾参加预付医疗保健计划的患者时面临更大风险。本研究考察了华盛顿州西部一家学术医疗中心与一项基于预付费人头的医疗计划的附属关系,并着重关注人口统计学特征、既往存在的医疗状况、近期的医疗服务利用情况,以及影响参保者选择医疗保健计划、诊所和医生的因素。研究假设是,在这些因素中的许多方面,大学诊所的参保者与非大学诊所的参保者会有所不同。向400名大学诊所参保者和759名非大学私人诊所参保者的随机样本发放了问卷。回复率为56.1%。结果显示,与同一计划中的非大学诊所参保者相比,大学诊所参保者明显更年轻,受教育程度更高。与非大学诊所参保者相比,大学诊所参保者报告的医疗服务利用较少,在选择医疗保健计划、诊所和医生时表达的强烈偏好也较少。基于这项调查,没有证据表明学术医疗中心比非大学诊所吸引了病情更重的健康维护组织参保者。