Miller R H
Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco 94109, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1998 Aug;33(3 Pt 2):653-80; discussion 681-4.
To summarize evidence from peer-reviewed literature on access to care for vulnerable HMO enrollee populations; to discuss the potential effect of recent HMO and physician organization changes on access to care and its measurement.
Review and summary of peer-reviewed literature for two HMO populations: those with chronic conditions and diseases, and those subject to discrimination due to income, color, or ethnic background. I also reviewed and summarized literature on three major changes in capitated organizations (HMOs and capitated physician organizations) that could affect access to care for vulnerable populations, and summarized findings from healthcare manager interviews conducted for several recent research projects on health system change.
Although mixed, there are enough negative results to raise some concerns about access to care for HMO enrollees with chronic conditions and diseases. Several emerging organizational changes have the potential to change access to care for the vulnerable HMO enrollees. The shift in cost-cutting from fragmented clinical management of specific services at a point in time toward more integrated clinical management of all services for specific types of patients across time may improve access to care, as may increased efforts to attract and retain HMO enrollees. The increased importance of capitated provider organizations within the health system may restrict access in some ways, and expand access in others.
Organizational changes can affect both access to care and its measurement. More research is needed on the effects of these changes on access to care and quality of care. For researchers examining access to care for vulnerable HMO enrollee populations, these changes create challenges to determine the most appropriate measures of access to care, and the most appropriate organizations and organizational characteristics to measure. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE, MANAGEMENT, AND/OR POLICY: Changes in market competition are leading to organizational changes that affect access to care for vulnerable HMO enrollee populations. Public and/or private policies that improve measurement and reporting can affect market competition and improve access to care.
总结同行评审文献中关于弱势健康维护组织(HMO)参保人群获得医疗服务的证据;讨论近期HMO和医师组织变革对获得医疗服务及其衡量的潜在影响。
对同行评审文献进行回顾和总结,涉及两类HMO人群:患有慢性病和疾病的人群,以及因收入、肤色或种族背景而受到歧视的人群。我还回顾和总结了有关按人头付费组织(HMO和按人头付费的医师组织)的三大变革的文献,这些变革可能会影响弱势人群获得医疗服务的情况,并总结了近期几个关于卫生系统变革的研究项目中对医疗保健管理人员访谈的结果。
尽管结果不一,但有足够多的负面结果引发了对患有慢性病和疾病的HMO参保人群获得医疗服务的担忧。一些新出现的组织变革有可能改变弱势HMO参保人群获得医疗服务的情况。成本削减从特定时间点对特定服务的分散临床管理转向对特定类型患者的所有服务进行更综合的跨时间临床管理,可能会改善获得医疗服务的情况,吸引和留住HMO参保人群的更多努力也可能如此。按人头付费的医疗服务提供者组织在卫生系统中重要性的增加可能在某些方面限制获得医疗服务的机会,而在其他方面扩大这种机会。
组织变革会影响获得医疗服务及其衡量。需要更多研究来探讨这些变革对获得医疗服务和医疗质量的影响。对于研究弱势HMO参保人群获得医疗服务情况的研究人员来说,这些变革给确定获得医疗服务的最合适衡量标准以及要衡量的最合适组织和组织特征带来了挑战。与临床实践、管理和/或政策的相关性:市场竞争的变化导致组织变革,影响弱势HMO参保人群获得医疗服务。改善衡量和报告的公共和/或私人政策可以影响市场竞争并改善获得医疗服务的情况。