Suppr超能文献

与纱布拭子相比,单丝纤维清创垫清洁效果的体外评估

In vitro Evaluation of the Cleansing Effect of a Monofilament Fiber Debridement Pad Compared to Gauze Swabs.

作者信息

Wiegand Cornelia, Reddersen Kirsten, Hipler Uta-Christina, Abel Martin, Ruth Peter, Andriessen Anneke

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;29(6):318-323. doi: 10.1159/000454720. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Removal of nonvital tissue is an accepted method to eradicate biofilms and to stimulate wound healing. Debridement using a monofilament polyester fiber pad has clinically been shown to be effective as well as pain and trauma free.

METHODS

For in vitro determination of the cleansing capacity of this product compared to gauze swabs, a wound debridement model was used with glass plates coated with a bovine serum albumin solution, stained with hematoxylin. Both products were moistened and fixed to a weight connected to a regulated motor and were then pulled over the holding device with the coated glass plate under standardized conditions (power = 0.067 N/cm2, velocity = 1.6 cm/s).

RESULTS

At a low coating concentration (0.5%) both products were equally effective, but at a high concentration (1.5%) cleansing did not occur after 5 wipes. When wiping the plates 15 times, the debridement pad cleansed significantly (p < 0.001) better than gauze. When consecutively wiping 4 coated plates with a single debridement pad or swab, the pad exhibited and maintained a significantly higher cleansing capacity while gauze quickly lost its effect.

CONCLUSION

Our in vitro test results indicated a higher cleansing capacity of the debridement pad compared to gauze swabs.

摘要

背景

去除失活组织是根除生物膜和促进伤口愈合的一种公认方法。临床上已证明,使用单丝聚酯纤维垫进行清创术既有效,又无痛且无创伤。

方法

为了在体外测定该产品与纱布拭子相比的清洁能力,使用了一个伤口清创模型,该模型采用涂有牛血清白蛋白溶液并用苏木精染色的玻璃板。将两种产品浸湿后固定在与调节电机相连的重物上,然后在标准化条件下(功率 = 0.067 N/cm²,速度 = 1.6 cm/s),将其拉过装有涂层玻璃板的固定装置。

结果

在低涂层浓度(0.5%)下,两种产品的效果相同,但在高浓度(1.5%)下,擦拭5次后未发生清洁作用。当擦拭玻璃板15次时,清创垫的清创效果明显优于纱布(p < 0.001)。当用单个清创垫或拭子连续擦拭4个涂有涂层的玻璃板时,清创垫表现出并保持了明显更高的清洁能力,而纱布的效果很快就消失了。

结论

我们的体外测试结果表明,与纱布拭子相比,清创垫具有更高的清洁能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验