Munavalli Girish
J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Nov 1;15(11):1335-1342.
Recent appreciation of the multifactorial pathophysiology of skin aging has led to increased use of parallel treatment regimens. This prospective, split-face, randomized study assessed the safety and efficacy of same-day sequential Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and 1565 nm non-ablative fractional laser (SST) facial rejuvenation treatment in comparison to fractional non-ablative laser (NAFL) treatment only. Seventeen patients underwent three treatment sessions, conducted at 4-6-week intervals, in which SST treatment was delivered on a randomly selected side of the face followed by NAFL treatment on the contralateral side immediately thereafter. Immediate skin responses were assessed within 30 minutes of treatment, while wrinkle/elastosis scores, and skin tone and texture were evaluated 1, 3, and 6 months following the final treatment session. While SST and NAFL proved equally safe, SST was associated with signi cantly lower pain scores in all three treatment sessions. Both treatment regimens yielded signi cant improvements in wrinkle/elastosis scores, which were maintained throughout the 6 months of follow up. Physician-evaluated skin tone and patient ratings of skin texture and overall improvement of the SST-treated side were consistently higher than the contralateral NAFL-treated side. Histological analysis suggested a broader effect, alongside sparing of the outermost epidermal layer with the SST versus NAFL treatment. Although the SST regimen failed to demonstrate statistically signi cant clinical superiority over the NAFL regimen, the significantly lower pain levels, consistently higher physician and patient ratings following SST may justify its regular use as a skin rejuvenation technique. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(11):1335-1342..
最近对皮肤老化多因素病理生理学的认识促使人们更多地采用联合治疗方案。这项前瞻性、半脸、随机研究评估了同日序贯调Q开关Nd:YAG激光和1565 nm非剥脱性分次激光(SST)面部年轻化治疗与仅采用非剥脱性分次激光(NAFL)治疗相比的安全性和有效性。17名患者接受了3次治疗,间隔4 - 6周进行一次,在随机选择的一侧面部进行SST治疗,随后立即在对侧进行NAFL治疗。在治疗后30分钟内评估即时皮肤反应,在最后一次治疗后1、3和6个月评估皱纹/弹性组织评分、肤色和质地。虽然SST和NAFL同样安全,但在所有三次治疗中,SST的疼痛评分明显更低。两种治疗方案在皱纹/弹性组织评分方面均有显著改善,且在6个月的随访期内保持稳定。医生评估的肤色以及患者对SST治疗侧皮肤质地和整体改善的评分始终高于对侧NAFL治疗侧。组织学分析表明,与NAFL治疗相比,SST治疗除了对最外层表皮有保留作用外,还有更广泛的效果。尽管SST方案未能在统计学上显示出比NAFL方案有显著的临床优势,但SST治疗后疼痛水平明显更低,医生和患者评分始终更高,这可能使其有理由作为一种皮肤年轻化技术经常使用。《药物皮肤病学杂志》。2016年;15(11):1335 - 1342。