Bettger Janet Prvu, Thomas Laine, Liang Li, Xian Ying, Bushnell Cheryl D, Saver Jeffrey L, Fonarow Gregg C, Peterson Eric D
From the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.P.B., L.T., L.L., Y.X., E.D.P.); Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (C.D.B.); and University of California at Los Angeles (J.L.S., G.C.F.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002391.
Functional status is a key patient-centric outcome, but there are little data on whether functional recovery post-stroke varies among hospitals. This study examined the distribution of functional status 3 months after stroke, determined whether these outcomes vary among hospitals, and identified hospital characteristics associated with better (or worse) functional outcomes.
Observational analysis of the AVAIL study (Adherence Evaluation After Ischemic Stroke-Longitudinal) included 2083 ischemic stroke patients enrolled from 82 US hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke and AVAIL. The primary outcome was dependence or death at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 3-6). Secondary outcomes included functional dependence (mRS score of 3-5), disabled (mRS score of 2-5), and mRS evaluated as a continuous score. By 3 months post-discharge, 36.5% of patients were functionally dependent or dead. Rates of dependence or death varied widely by discharging hospitals (range: 0%-67%). After risk adjustment, patients had lower rates of 3-month dependence or death when treated at teaching hospitals (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.96) and certified primary stroke centers (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.91). In contrast, a composite measure of hospital-level adherence to acute stroke care performance metrics, stroke volume, and bed size was not associated with downstream patient functional status. Findings were robust across mRS end points and sensitivity analyses.
One third of acute ischemic stroke patients were functionally dependent or dead 3 months postacute stroke; functional recovery rates varied considerably among hospitals, supporting the need to better determine which care processes can maximize functional outcomes.
功能状态是以患者为中心的关键结局指标,但关于卒中后功能恢复在不同医院之间是否存在差异的数据较少。本研究调查了卒中后3个月时功能状态的分布情况,确定这些结局在不同医院之间是否存在差异,并确定与更好(或更差)功能结局相关的医院特征。
对AVAIL研究(缺血性卒中纵向随访后的依从性评估)进行观察性分析,纳入了从82家参与“遵循卒中指南”和AVAIL研究的美国医院招募的2083例缺血性卒中患者。主要结局是3个月时的依赖或死亡(改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分3 - 6分)。次要结局包括功能依赖(mRS评分3 - 5分)、残疾(mRS评分2 - 5分),以及将mRS作为连续评分进行评估。出院后3个月时,36.5%的患者存在功能依赖或死亡。依赖或死亡发生率在不同的出院医院之间差异很大(范围:0% - 67%)。经过风险调整后,在教学医院接受治疗的患者3个月时依赖或死亡的发生率较低(比值比为0.72;95%置信区间为0.54 - 0.96),在认证的初级卒中中心接受治疗的患者也是如此(比值比为0.69;95%置信区间为0.53 - 0.91)。相比之下,医院层面在急性卒中护理绩效指标、卒中单元规模和床位规模方面的综合指标与患者下游功能状态无关。在mRS终点和敏感性分析中,研究结果均很稳健。
三分之一的急性缺血性卒中患者在急性卒中后3个月时存在功能依赖或死亡;不同医院之间的功能恢复率差异很大,这支持了需要更好地确定哪些护理流程能够使功能结局最大化的观点。