• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用化学交换饱和传递技术区分放射性坏死与肿瘤进展。

Differentiation between Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer.

机构信息

Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3667-3675. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2265. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2265
PMID:28096269
Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment used in patients with brain metastases and is associated with high rates of local control, however, at the risk of radiation necrosis. It is difficult to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumor progression using conventional MRI, making it a major diagnostic dilemma for practitioners. This prospective study investigated whether chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) was able to differentiate these two conditions. Sixteen patients with brain metastases who had been previously treated with SRS were included. Average time between SRS and evaluation was 12.6 months. Lesion type was determined by pathology in 9 patients and the other 7 were clinically followed. CEST imaging was performed on a 3T Philips scanner and the following CEST metrics were measured: amide proton transfer (APT), magnetization transfer (MT), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and area under the curve for CEST peaks corresponding to amide and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE). Five lesions were classified as progressing tumor and 11 were classified as radiation necrosis (using histopathologic confirmation and radiographic follow-up). The best separation was obtained by NOE (NOE = 8.9 ± 0.9%, NOE = 12.6 ± 1.6%, < 0.0001) and Amide (Amide = 8.2 ± 1.0%, Amide = 12.0 ± 1.9%, < 0.0001). MT (MT = 4.7 ± 1.0%, MT = 6.7 ± 1.7%, = 0.009) and NOE (NOE = 4.3 ± 2.0% Hz, NOE = 7.2 ± 1.9% Hz, = 0.019) provided statistically significant separation but with higher values. CEST was capable of differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases. Both NOE and Amide provided statistically significant separation of the two cohorts. However, APT was unable to differentiate the two groups. .

摘要

立体定向放射外科(SRS)是一种常用于脑转移瘤患者的治疗方法,具有很高的局部控制率,但存在放射性坏死的风险。使用常规 MRI 很难区分放射性坏死和肿瘤进展,这对医生来说是一个主要的诊断难题。这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨化学交换饱和传递(CEST)是否能够区分这两种情况。16 例脑转移瘤患者曾接受 SRS 治疗,SRS 与评估之间的平均时间为 12.6 个月。9 例患者的病变类型由病理确定,其余 7 例患者进行临床随访。CEST 成像在 3T 飞利浦扫描仪上进行,测量以下 CEST 指标:酰胺质子转移(APT)、磁化转移(MT)、磁化转移比(MTR)和对应于酰胺和核 Overhauser 效应(NOE)的 CEST 峰的曲线下面积。5 个病灶被归类为进展性肿瘤,11 个病灶被归类为放射性坏死(使用组织病理学证实和影像学随访)。NOE(NOE = 8.9 ± 0.9%,NOE = 12.6 ± 1.6%,<0.0001)和酰胺(Amide = 8.2 ± 1.0%,Amide = 12.0 ± 1.9%,<0.0001)的分离效果最好。MT(MT = 4.7 ± 1.0%,MT = 6.7 ± 1.7%,= 0.009)和 NOE(NOE = 4.3 ± 2.0% Hz,NOE = 7.2 ± 1.9% Hz,= 0.019)提供了统计学上显著的分离,但值较高。CEST 能够区分脑转移瘤中的放射性坏死和肿瘤进展。NOE 和酰胺均能统计学上显著分离两组。然而,APT 无法区分两组。

相似文献

1
Differentiation between Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer.利用化学交换饱和传递技术区分放射性坏死与肿瘤进展。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3667-3675. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2265. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Differentiating Radiation Necrosis From Tumor Progression in Brain Metastasis-Application in a Clinical Setting.用于鉴别脑转移瘤中放射性坏死与肿瘤进展的化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像——临床应用
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jun;57(6):1713-1725. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28440. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Chemical exchange saturation transfer for predicting response to stereotactic radiosurgery in human brain metastasis.化学交换饱和转移预测人类脑转移立体定向放射外科治疗反应。
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Sep;78(3):1110-1120. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26470. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
4
Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy: utility of intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MRI and correlation with histopathology.在立体定向放疗治疗脑转移瘤中,从肿瘤进展中鉴别放射性坏死:应用体素内不相干运动灌注 MRI 的效用及其与组织病理学的相关性。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Sep;134(2):433-441. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2545-2. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
Whole-brain amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in glioma patients using low-power steady-state pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 7T.使用7T低功率稳态脉冲化学交换饱和转移(CEST)成像技术对胶质瘤患者进行全脑酰胺质子转移(APT)和核Overhauser增强(NOE)成像。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jul;44(1):41-50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25108. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Multivoxel proton MRS for differentiation of radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.多体素质子磁共振波谱在鉴别脑转移瘤伽玛刀放射外科治疗后放射性坏死与肿瘤复发中的应用
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2006 Apr;23(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s10014-006-0194-9.
7
Brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell gamma knife: can FDG PET help to differentiate radionecrosis from tumour progression?使用Leksell伽玛刀立体定向放射治疗后的脑转移瘤:氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG PET)能否有助于区分放射性坏死与肿瘤进展?
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Jan;30(1):96-100. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1011-2. Epub 2002 Nov 5.
8
Direct radiofrequency saturation corrected amide proton transfer tumor MRI at 3T.3T 下直接射频饱和校正酰胺质子转移肿瘤 MRI。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Apr;81(4):2710-2719. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27562. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
9
First follow-up radiographic response is one of the predictors of local tumor progression and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.首次随访时的放射学反应是立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤后局部肿瘤进展和放射性坏死的预测因素之一。
Cancer Med. 2017 Sep;6(9):2076-2086. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1149. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Radiation injury versus malignancy after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: impact of time-dependent changes in lesion morphology on MRI.脑转移瘤立体定向放射治疗后的放射性损伤与恶性肿瘤:MRI上病变形态随时间变化的影响
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):586-594. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now193.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel radiotherapy target definition using AI-driven predictions of glioblastoma recurrence from metabolic and diffusion MRI.利用人工智能驱动的代谢和扩散磁共振成像预测胶质母细胞瘤复发进行新型放射治疗靶区定义。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 7;8(1):508. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01861-2.
2
Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌的自适应放射治疗
ArXiv. 2025 Aug 1:arXiv:2508.00651v1.
3
Differentiation of breast cancer subtypes and correlation with biological status using functional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging.
利用功能磁共振成像对乳腺癌亚型进行鉴别及其与生物学状态的相关性:与酰胺质子转移加权成像和扩散加权成像的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):6102-6117. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2174. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
4
Applications of Advanced Imaging for Radiotherapy Planning and Response Assessment in the Central Nervous System.先进成像技术在中枢神经系统放射治疗计划与反应评估中的应用
Tomography. 2025 Jun 12;11(6):68. doi: 10.3390/tomography11060068.
5
Human liver CEST imaging at 7 T: Impact of shimming.7T场强下人体肝脏化学交换饱和转移成像:匀场的影响
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Oct;94(4):1604-1615. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30557. Epub 2025 May 24.
6
Fluid-Suppressed Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging Outperforms Leakage-Corrected Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion in Distinguishing Progression from Radionecrosis in Brain Metastases.在鉴别脑转移瘤放射性坏死进展方面,液体抑制酰胺质子转移加权成像优于渗漏校正动态磁敏感对比灌注成像。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;17(7):1175. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071175.
7
Quantitative molecular imaging using deep magnetic resonance fingerprinting.使用深度磁共振指纹识别的定量分子成像。
Nat Protoc. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1038/s41596-025-01152-w.
8
Diagnostics and Screening in Breast Cancer with Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Literature.乳腺癌脑转移和软脑膜转移的诊断与筛查:文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;16(21):3686. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213686.
9
Reproducibility of 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrasts in the healthy brain at 3T.3T 健康大脑中 3D 化学交换饱和传递(CEST)对比的可重复性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27;14(1):25637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75777-4.
10
Advanced imaging techniques and non-invasive biomarkers in pediatric brain tumors: state of the art.儿科脑肿瘤中的先进成像技术和非侵入性生物标志物:现状
Neuroradiology. 2024 Dec;66(12):2093-2116. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03476-y. Epub 2024 Oct 9.