Suppr超能文献

一项随机、双盲临床研究,比较60毫克奥利司他和定制聚葡萄糖胺这两种治疗超重和肥胖的方法。

Randomised, double-blind, clinical investigation to compare orlistat 60 milligram and a customized polyglucosamine, two treatment methods for the management of overweight and obesity.

作者信息

Stoll Manfred, Bitterlich Norman, Cornelli Umberto

机构信息

Diabetological Center, Frankfurter Str. 50, D-63303 Dreieich, Germany.

Medizin and Service GmbH, Abt. Biostatistik, Boettcherstr. 10, D-09117 Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Obes. 2017 Jan 11;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s40608-016-0130-4. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of a non-prescription drug to support weight loss programs has yet to be compared. This clinical trial investigates the comparability of orlistat 60 milligram (mg) and polyglucosamine.

METHODS

Sixty-four overweight or obese subjects were included in a two-center double-blind study. One center was in Germany [center 1] and the other was in Italy [center 2]. The subjects (26 in center 1 and 38 in center 2) were recommended to follow a calorie deficit of about 2000 kilojoules/day and to increase their physical activity to 3 metabolic equivalent hours (MET h)/day. In both centers, subjects were randomized to receive polyglucosamine (2 tablets x 2) or orlistat (1 capsule x 3) for a period of 12 weeks. Weight loss was considered as a main variable together with the reduction of 5 per cent (%) of body weight (5R). Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were taken as secondary variables.

RESULTS

A significant difference in weight loss between the two groups was shown, 6.7 ± 3.14 kilogram (kg) in group polyglucosamine versus 4.8 ± 2.24 kg in group orlistat (t test  < 0.05) respectively; BMI and WC reduction were also more consistent with polyglucosamine treatment than with orlistat treatment (t test  < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the number of subjects who achieved 5R (70% for polyglucosamine and 55% for orlistat group; chi square  > 0.05). The administration of polyglucosamine following energy restriction and increase in physical activity reduces body weight, BMI and WC more efficiently than orlistat.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though both groups were instructed to adopt a calorie restricted diet together with increased physical activity an additional weight loss in the polyglucosamine group of 1.6 kilogram (kg) compared to the orlistat group (6.2 ± 3.46 versus 4.6 ± 2.36 kg) in both centers was seen despite the higher consumption of carbohydrates in Italy (center 2). A typical Italian diet is usually high in carbohydrate content whereas Germans tend to consume meals with higher fat content. This leads to the assumption that polyglucosamine limits both fat and carbohydrate absorption which would explain the comparable effective weight reduction in the Italian participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529631, registered on Aug 19, 2015 retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

一种非处方药对支持减肥计划的疗效尚未得到比较。本临床试验研究了60毫克奥利司他与聚葡萄糖胺的可比性。

方法

64名超重或肥胖受试者被纳入一项双中心双盲研究。一个中心在德国[中心1],另一个在意大利[中心2]。建议受试者(中心1有26名,中心2有38名)每天减少约2000千焦的热量摄入,并将身体活动量增加到每天3代谢当量小时(MET h)。在两个中心,受试者被随机分配接受聚葡萄糖胺(2片×2)或奥利司他(1粒胶囊×3),为期12周。体重减轻与体重降低5%(5R)一起被视为主要变量。体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)被作为次要变量。

结果

两组间体重减轻存在显著差异,聚葡萄糖胺组为6.7±3.14千克(kg),而奥利司他组为4.8±2.24千克(t检验<0.05);与奥利司他治疗相比,聚葡萄糖胺治疗导致的BMI和WC降低也更一致(t检验<0.05)。在实现5R的受试者数量上未发现显著差异(聚葡萄糖胺组为70%,奥利司他组为55%;卡方检验>0.05)。在能量限制和增加身体活动的基础上服用聚葡萄糖胺比奥利司他更有效地减轻体重、BMI和WC。

结论

尽管两组都被指示采用热量限制饮食并增加身体活动,但在两个中心,聚葡萄糖胺组与奥利司他组相比额外减重1.6千克(kg)(分别为6.2±3.46千克和4.6±2.36千克),尽管意大利(中心2)的碳水化合物摄入量较高。典型的意大利饮食通常碳水化合物含量高,而德国人倾向于食用脂肪含量较高的食物。这导致一种假设,即聚葡萄糖胺限制脂肪和碳水化合物的吸收,这可以解释意大利参与者有效减重相当的原因。

试验注册

在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行试验注册,NCT02529631,于2015年8月19日追溯注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff5a/5225614/bb18f591c920/40608_2016_130_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验