Ball Mark W, Schwen Zeyad R, Ko Joan S, Meyer Alexa, Netto George J, Burnett Arthur L, Bivalacqua Trinity J
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):20-26. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.20. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
To determine the impact of lymph node density (LND) on survival after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer.
Our institutional penile cancer database was queried for patients who underwent ILND. Clinicopathologic characteristics including LND and total number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed to determine impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). LND, or the percent of positive LN out of total LN, was calculated as a categorical variable at varying thresholds.
Twenty-eight patients with complete follow-up were identified. Indications for ILND were stage >T2 in 20 patients (71.4%), palpable adenopathy in 7 (25%), high grade T1 in 1 (3.6%). Median node yield was 17.5 (interquartile range, 12-22), and positive LNs were found in 14 patients (50%). RFS and OS were significantly lower for patients with >15% LN density (median RFS: 62 months vs. 6.3 months, p=0.0120; median OS: 73.6 months vs. 6.3 months, p<0.001). Controlling for age, medical comorbidities, number of positive LN, T stage, pelvic LN status and indication, LN density >15% was independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; p=0.04) and OS (HR, 73.6; p=0.002). The c-index for LND was higher than total positive LNs for RFS (0.64 vs. 0.54) and OS (0.79 vs. 0.61).
In this small, retrospective penile cancer cohort, the presence of nodal involvement >15% was associated with decreased RFS and OS, and outperformed total number of positive LN as a prognostic indicator.
确定淋巴结密度(LND)对阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)后生存的影响。
查询我们机构的阴茎癌数据库中接受ILND的患者。分析包括LND和阳性淋巴结(LN)总数在内的临床病理特征,以确定其对无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。LND,即阳性LN占总LN的百分比,被计算为不同阈值下的分类变量。
确定了28例有完整随访资料的患者。ILND的指征为20例(71.4%)患者分期>T2,7例(25%)可触及腺病,1例(3.6%)为高级别T1。中位淋巴结收获数为17.5(四分位间距,12 - 22),14例(50%)患者发现阳性LN。LN密度>15%的患者RFS和OS显著更低(中位RFS:62个月对6.3个月,p = 0.0120;中位OS:73.6个月对6.3个月,p<0.001)。在控制年龄、内科合并症、阳性LN数量、T分期、盆腔LN状态和指征后,LN密度>15%与更差的RFS(风险比[HR],3.6;p = 0.04)和OS(HR,73.6;p = 0.002)独立相关。LND的c指数在RFS方面高于总阳性LN(0.64对0.54),在OS方面也高于总阳性LN(0.79对0.61)。
在这个小型回顾性阴茎癌队列中,淋巴结受累>15%与RFS和OS降低相关,并且作为预后指标优于阳性LN总数。