• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过面部照片估算颅骨与相机的距离以进行颅面叠加

Estimating the Skull-to-Camera Distance from Facial Photographs for Craniofacial Superimposition.

作者信息

Stephan Carl N

机构信息

Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2017 Jul;62(4):850-860. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13353. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.13353
PMID:28097661
Abstract

The overlay of a skull and a face image for identification purposes requires similar subject-to-camera distances (SCD) to be used at both photographic sessions so that differences in perspective do not compromise the anatomical comparisons. As the facial photograph is the reference standard, it is crucial to determine its SCD first and apply this value to photography of the skull. So far, such a method for estimating the SCD has been elusive (some say impossible), compromising the technical validity of the superimposition procedure. This paper tests the feasibility of using the palpebral fissure length and a well-established photographic algorithm to accurately estimate the SCD from the facial photograph. Recordings at known SCD across a 1-10 m range (repeated under two test conditions) demonstrate that the newly formulated method works: a mean SCD estimation error of 7% that translates into <1% perspective distortion error between estimated and actual conditions.

摘要

为了进行身份识别而将颅骨图像与面部图像叠加,需要在两次摄影过程中使用相似的受试者到相机的距离(SCD),以便视角差异不会影响解剖结构的比较。由于面部照片是参考标准,首先确定其SCD并将该值应用于颅骨摄影至关重要。到目前为止,这种估计SCD的方法一直难以捉摸(有人说不可能),这损害了叠加程序的技术有效性。本文测试了使用睑裂长度和成熟的摄影算法从面部照片中准确估计SCD的可行性。在1-10米范围内已知SCD的记录(在两种测试条件下重复)表明,新制定的方法是有效的:平均SCD估计误差为7%,这意味着估计条件与实际条件之间的视角畸变误差小于1%。

相似文献

1
Estimating the Skull-to-Camera Distance from Facial Photographs for Craniofacial Superimposition.通过面部照片估算颅骨与相机的距离以进行颅面叠加
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Jul;62(4):850-860. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13353. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
Perspective distortion in craniofacial superimposition: Logarithmic decay curves mapped mathematically and by practical experiment.颅面叠加中的透视畸变:通过数学方法和实际实验绘制的对数衰减曲线
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:520.e1-520.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Craniofacial superimposition: a review of focus distance estimation methods and an extension to profile view photographs.颅面叠合:聚焦距离估计方法综述及侧面照片的扩展。
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Nov;136(6):1697-1716. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02871-5. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review.颅面重叠中的透视变形容限和颅骨-面部配准:分析综述。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Nov;137(6):1767-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology.法医人类学中计算机辅助面部/颅骨识别的一种新实验方法。
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006 Mar;27(1):46-9. doi: 10.1097/01.paf.0000202809.96283.88.
6
Computer vision and soft computing for automatic skull-face overlay in craniofacial superimposition.用于颅面叠加中自动颅骨-面部重叠的计算机视觉与软计算
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Dec;245:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
7
Cranio-facial morphanalysis: a new method for enhancing reliability while identifying skulls by photo superimposition.颅面形态分析:一种通过照片叠加识别颅骨时提高可靠性的新方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2001 Mar 1;117(1-2):121-43. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00455-2.
8
Past, present, and future of craniofacial superimposition: Literature and international surveys.颅面重合技术的过去、现在与未来:文献综述及国际调查
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015 Jul;17(4):267-78. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Use of craniofacial superimposition in historic investigation.颅面重合技术在历史研究中的应用。
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):260-3. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12296. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
On the integral use of foundational concepts in verifying validity during skull-photo superimposition.关于在颅骨照片叠加过程中验证有效性时基础概念的综合运用。
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Sep;278:411.e1-411.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Critical Photographic Variables Contributing to Skull-Face Superimposition Methods to Assist Forensic Identification of Skeletons: A Review.有助于颅骨-面部叠加法辅助骨骼法医鉴定的关键摄影变量:综述
J Imaging. 2024 Jan 7;10(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10010017.
2
Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review.颅面重叠中的透视变形容限和颅骨-面部配准:分析综述。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Nov;137(6):1767-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Focus distance estimation from photographed faces: a test of PerspectiveX using 1709 frontal and profile photographs from DSLR and smartphone cameras.
从拍摄的人脸估计焦距:使用单反和智能手机拍摄的 1709 张正面和侧面照片对 PerspectiveX 的测试。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Nov;137(6):1907-1920. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03078-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Craniofacial superimposition: a review of focus distance estimation methods and an extension to profile view photographs.颅面叠合:聚焦距离估计方法综述及侧面照片的扩展。
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Nov;136(6):1697-1716. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02871-5. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.法医面部比对:现状、局限性与未来方向。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;10(12):1269. doi: 10.3390/biology10121269.
6
Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments.颅面照片叠加:新进展。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Oct 4;1:271-274. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.10.002. eCollection 2019.
7
Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances.灾难受害者身份鉴定中的法医牙科学:当前实践与最新进展
Forensic Sci Res. 2019 Nov 6;4(4):316-330. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1678710. eCollection 2019.
8
An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.面部成像最新进展概述。
Forensic Sci Res. 2018 Oct 29;4(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892. eCollection 2019.