Suppr超能文献

α受体阻滞剂在输尿管结石治疗中的应用:一项荟萃分析。

Alpha blockers in the management of ureteric lithiasis: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Raison Nicholas, Ahmed Kamran, Brunckhorst Oliver, Dasgupta Prokar

机构信息

MRC Centre for Transplantation, Division of Transplantation Immunology & Mucosal Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

GKT School Of Medical Education, King's College London, The Strand, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12917.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective medical expulsion for ureteric stones with α-blockers offers numerous advantages over surgical alternatives. However, its effectiveness remains uncertain and with the publication of new trial data, the available evidence requires reappraisal.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of α-blockers the management of ureteric lithiasis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature, with predefined search criteria, was conducted using PubMed and Embase. All randomised trials comparing α-blocker monotherapy to placebo or standard therapy were included. Stone expulsion rate was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were time to stone expulsion, analgesic usage and pain scores. Subgroup analyses assessed individual adrenergic antagonists and variations in standard therapy. Sensitivity analysis was based on stone location, stone size, Cochrane Risk of Bias score and study protocol. Summary effects were calculated using a random-effect model and presented as Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) for dichotomous and continuous outcome measures, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies randomising 6654 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Stone expulsion rates improved with α-blockers (RR, 1.49; 95% CI 1.38-1.61). Contrast enhanced funnel showed evidence of publication bias. Stone expulsion time was 3.99 days (CI -4.75 to -3.23) shorter with α-blockers. Similarly, patients required 106.53 mg [CI -148.20 to -64.86] less diclofenac compared with control/placebo, and had 0.80 [CI -1.07 to -0.54] fewer pain episodes. Visual Analogue Scores were also reduced, -2.43 [CI -3.87 to -0.99]. All formulations of α-antagonists all demonstrated beneficial effects over conservative treatment/placebo. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated significant effects of stone location, stone size and study design.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Despite the opposing results of recently published trial, current evidence continues to demonstrate a potential benefit of α-blocker treatment particularly for distal stones over 5 mm.

摘要

引言

与手术治疗相比,使用α受体阻滞剂有效排出输尿管结石具有诸多优势。然而,其有效性仍不确定,随着新试验数据的公布,现有证据需要重新评估。

目的

本研究旨在评估α受体阻滞剂治疗输尿管结石的疗效。

方法

使用PubMed和Embase对文献进行系统回顾,并采用预定义的搜索标准。纳入所有比较α受体阻滞剂单药治疗与安慰剂或标准治疗的随机试验。结石排出率是主要结局指标。次要结局指标包括结石排出时间、镇痛药使用情况和疼痛评分。亚组分析评估了个体肾上腺素能拮抗剂和标准治疗的差异。敏感性分析基于结石位置、结石大小、Cochrane偏倚风险评分和研究方案。使用随机效应模型计算汇总效应,并分别以相对风险(RR)和平均差(MD)表示二分法和连续结局指标。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了67项随机分配6654例患者的研究。使用α受体阻滞剂可提高结石排出率(RR,1.49;95%CI 1.38 - 1.61)。对比增强漏斗图显示存在发表偏倚的证据。使用α受体阻滞剂时,结石排出时间缩短3.99天(CI - 4.75至 - 3.23)。同样,与对照组/安慰剂相比,患者所需双氯芬酸减少106.53mg[CI - 148.20至 - 64.86],疼痛发作次数减少0.80次[CI - 1.07至 - 0.54]。视觉模拟评分也降低了,为 - 2.43[CI - 3.87至 - 0.99]。所有α拮抗剂制剂均显示出优于保守治疗/安慰剂的有益效果。敏感性分析显示结石位置、结石大小和研究设计有显著影响。

结论及相关性

尽管最近发表的试验结果相反,但目前的证据继续表明α受体阻滞剂治疗具有潜在益处,特别是对于直径超过5mm的远端结石。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验