Suppr超能文献

用于去除乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)的透析程序的缺点。

Drawbacks of Dialysis Procedures for Removal of EDTA.

作者信息

Mónico Andreia, Martínez-Senra Eva, Cañada F Javier, Zorrilla Silvia, Pérez-Sala Dolores

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Physical Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C., Madrid, Spain.

Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C., Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169843. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent commonly used in protein purification, both to eliminate contaminating divalent cations and to inhibit protease activity. For a number of subsequent applications EDTA needs to be exhaustively removed. Most purification methods rely in extensive dialysis and/or gel filtration in order to exchange or remove protein buffer components, including metal chelators. We report here that dialysis protocols, even as extensive as those typically employed for protein refolding, may not effectively remove EDTA, which is reduced only by approximately two-fold and it also persists after spin-column gel filtration, as determined by NMR and by colorimetric methods. Remarkably, the most efficient removal was achieved by ultrafiltration, after which EDTA became virtually undetectable. These results highlight a potentially widespread source of experimental variability affecting free divalent cation concentrations in protein applications.

摘要

乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)是一种螯合剂,常用于蛋白质纯化,既能去除污染性二价阳离子,又能抑制蛋白酶活性。在许多后续应用中,需要彻底去除EDTA。大多数纯化方法依赖于广泛的透析和/或凝胶过滤,以交换或去除蛋白质缓冲液成分,包括金属螯合剂。我们在此报告,即使是像通常用于蛋白质复性那样广泛的透析方案,也可能无法有效去除EDTA,通过核磁共振(NMR)和比色法测定,EDTA仅减少约两倍,并且在旋转柱凝胶过滤后仍会残留。值得注意的是,通过超滤实现了最有效的去除,之后EDTA几乎检测不到。这些结果突出了一个潜在的广泛存在的实验变异性来源,它会影响蛋白质应用中游离二价阳离子的浓度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9935/5242421/2d70f8e46ab8/pone.0169843.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验