• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见病临床实践指南:欧睿罕病数据库

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rare Diseases: The Orphanet Database.

作者信息

Pavan Sonia, Rommel Kathrin, Mateo Marquina María Elena, Höhn Sophie, Lanneau Valérie, Rath Ana

机构信息

Inserm, US14 - Orphanet, Paris, France.

Orphanet Germany, Centre for Rare Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170365. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170365
PMID:28099516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5242437/
Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rare diseases (RDs) are scarce, may be difficult to identify through Internet searches and may vary in quality depending on the source and methodology used. In order to contribute to the improvement of the diagnosis, treatment and care of patients, Orphanet (www.orpha.net) has set up a procedure for the selection, quality evaluation and dissemination of CPGs, with the aim to provide easy access to relevant, accurate and specific recommendations for the management of RDs. This article provides an analysis of selected CPGs by medical domain coverage, prevalence of diseases, languages and type of producer, and addresses the variability in CPG quality and availability. CPGs are identified via bibliographic databases, websites of research networks, expert centres or medical societies. They are assessed according to quality criteria derived from the Appraisal of Guidelines, REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument. Only open access CPGs and documents for which permission from the copyright holders has been obtained are disseminated on the Orphanet website. From January 2012 to July 2015, 277 CPGs were disseminated, representing coverage of 1,122 groups of diseases, diseases or subtypes in the Orphanet database. No language restriction is applied, and so far 10 languages are represented, with a predominance of CPGs in English, French and German (92% of all CPGs). A large proportion of diseases with identified CPGs belong to rare oncologic, neurologic, hematologic diseases or developmental anomalies. The Orphanet project on CPG collection, evaluation and dissemination is a continuous process, with regular addition of new guidelines, and updates. CPGs meeting the quality criteria are integrated to the Orphanet database of rare diseases, together with other types of textual information and the appropriate services for patients, researchers and healthcare professionals in 40 countries.

摘要

罕见病的临床实践指南(CPG)数量稀少,可能难以通过互联网搜索找到,并且质量可能因来源和所采用的方法而异。为了有助于改善患者的诊断、治疗和护理,Orphanet(www.orpha.net)建立了一套CPG的筛选、质量评估和传播程序,旨在为罕见病的管理提供方便获取的相关、准确和具体的建议。本文按医学领域覆盖范围、疾病患病率、语言和制定者类型对选定的CPG进行了分析,并探讨了CPG质量和可获取性的差异。CPG通过书目数据库、研究网络网站、专家中心或医学协会来识别。根据源自《指南评估、研究与评价(AGREE II)工具》的质量标准对其进行评估。只有开放获取的CPG以及已获得版权所有者许可的文件才会在Orphanet网站上传播。从2012年1月至2015年7月,共传播了277份CPG,涵盖了Orphanet数据库中的1122组疾病、病症或亚型。没有语言限制,到目前为止有10种语言的CPG,其中英语、法语和德语的CPG占主导(占所有CPG的92%)。已确定CPG的疾病中很大一部分属于罕见肿瘤、神经、血液疾病或发育异常。Orphanet关于CPG收集、评估和传播的项目是一个持续的过程,会定期添加新指南并进行更新。符合质量标准的CPG与其他类型的文本信息以及为40个国家的患者、研究人员和医疗保健专业人员提供的适当服务一起被整合到Orphanet罕见病数据库中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/d481a380b369/pone.0170365.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/87f5e373553a/pone.0170365.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/48609505757b/pone.0170365.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/ac33aa74cd80/pone.0170365.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/79f8ffafffea/pone.0170365.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/d481a380b369/pone.0170365.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/87f5e373553a/pone.0170365.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/48609505757b/pone.0170365.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/ac33aa74cd80/pone.0170365.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/79f8ffafffea/pone.0170365.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3a/5242437/d481a380b369/pone.0170365.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rare Diseases: The Orphanet Database.罕见病临床实践指南:欧睿罕病数据库
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170365. eCollection 2017.
2
[Orphanet and its consortium: where to find expert-validated information on rare diseases].[欧洲罕见病组织及其联盟:获取罕见病专家验证信息的途径]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Feb;169 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/S0035-3787(13)70052-3.
3
[Orphanet: a European database for rare diseases].[欧洲罕见病数据库:孤儿网]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Mar 1;152(9):518-9.
4
[Use of a directory of specialized services and guidance in the healthcare system: the example of the Orphanet database for rare diseases].[医疗保健系统中专业服务目录及指南的使用:以罕见病Orphanet数据库为例]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2006 Feb;54(1):41-53. doi: 10.1016/s0398-7620(06)76693-7.
5
Quality and consistency of guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤管理指南的质量和一致性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):880-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01134.x.
6
Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed by Professional Societies in Turkey.土耳其专业协会制定的临床实践指南的质量评估
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156483. eCollection 2016.
7
Analysis of the quality of clinical practice guidelines on established ischemic stroke.已确诊缺血性卒中临床实践指南的质量分析
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):333-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080446.
8
[Orphanet and the Dutch Steering Committee Orphan Drugs. A European and Dutch databank of information on rare diseases].[欧洲罕见病组织及荷兰孤儿药指导委员会。欧洲和荷兰罕见病信息数据库]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2008 Nov;115(11):621-3.
9
Assessing the Methodological Quality of Glaucoma Clinical Practice Guidelines and Their Recommendations on Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review.评估青光眼临床实践指南的方法学质量及其关于微创青光眼手术的建议:一项系统评价。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Feb;27(2):e44-e49. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000820.
10
Assessing methodological quality of Russian clinical practice guidelines and introducing AGREE II instrument in Russia.评估俄罗斯临床实践指南的方法学质量并在俄罗斯引入 AGREE II 工具。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0203328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203328. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of cystinosis: systematic review for a clinical practice guideline.胱氨酸病的诊断与管理:临床实践指南的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 28;20(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03974-z.
2
Knowledge and attitudes about rare genetic diseases among practitioners of oral medicine/pathology in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.巴西口腔医学/病理学从业者对罕见遗传病的认知与态度:一项横断面研究。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jul 7;6:1573355. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1573355. eCollection 2025.
3
Few shot learning for phenotype-driven diagnosis of patients with rare genetic diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
Review and evaluation of the methodological quality of the existing guidelines and recommendations for inherited neurometabolic disorders.对现有遗传性神经代谢疾病指南和建议的方法学质量进行回顾与评估。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Dec 30;10:164. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0376-9.
2
Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.肿瘤学临床实践指南与共识声明——对其方法学质量的评估
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 17;9(10):e110469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110469. eCollection 2014.
3
The expert patient: towards a novel definition.
用于罕见遗传病患者表型驱动诊断的少样本学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 20;8(1):380. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01749-1.
4
Health-related quality of life and productivity burden for non-professional caregivers of adults with rare diseases: a real-world study.罕见病成年患者非专业照护者的健康相关生活质量和生产力负担:一项真实世界研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 6;20(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03796-z.
5
A resource description framework (RDF) model of named entity co-occurrences in biomedical literature and its integration with PubChemRDF.生物医学文献中命名实体共现的资源描述框架(RDF)模型及其与PubChemRDF的整合。
J Cheminform. 2025 May 21;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-01017-0.
6
Profiling of Protein-Coding Missense Mutations in Mendelian Rare Diseases: Clues from Structural Bioinformatics.孟德尔罕见病中蛋白质编码错义突变的分析:来自结构生物信息学的线索
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 25;26(9):4072. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094072.
7
First steps toward building natural history of diseases computationally: Lessons learned from the Noonan syndrome use case.通过计算构建疾病自然史的初步探索:从努南综合征用例中汲取的经验教训。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 May 1;112(5):1158-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.014. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
8
Guidelines for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP): challenges in defining clinical management for a rare disease.家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)指南:罕见病临床管理定义中的挑战
Fam Cancer. 2025 Apr 7;24(2):35. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00462-y.
9
The role of public health in rare diseases: hemophilia as an example.公共卫生在罕见病中的作用:以血友病为例。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;13:1450625. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1450625. eCollection 2025.
10
Human Phenotype Ontology Annotations for Rare Congenital Conditions: Application to Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.罕见先天性疾病的人类表型本体注释:在多发性先天性关节挛缩症中的应用。
Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Aug;197(8):e64067. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.64067. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
专家型患者:迈向一种新定义。
Eur Respir J. 2014 Oct;44(4):853-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00027414.
4
Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.检索临床证据:PubMed与谷歌学术用于快速临床检索的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 15;15(8):e164. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2624.
5
Guidelines for guidelines: are they up to the task? A comparative assessment of clinical practice guideline development handbooks.指南制定指南:它们是否胜任这项任务?临床实践指南制定手册的比较评估。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049864. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
6
Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar.医学文献检索:PubMed 和 Google Scholar 的比较。
Health Info Libr J. 2012 Sep;29(3):214-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00992.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
7
Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe.欧洲慢性疾病管理临床指南制定方法学质量的系统评价。
Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
8
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评估研究的系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042077.
9
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.《AGREE II:推进卫生保健领域的指南制定、报告与评估》
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
10
Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches.循证临床实践指南(CPGs)的制定:方法比较。
Implement Sci. 2008 Oct 27;3:45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-45.