Craig Chesney E, Doumas Michail
School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim, United Kingdom.
Research Centre for Health, Exercise and Active Living, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170331. eCollection 2017.
We investigated whether stimulating the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could affect postural control in young and older adults. tDCS was employed using a double-blind, sham-controlled design, in which young (aged 18-35) and older adults (aged 65+) were assessed over three sessions, one for each stimulatory condition-M1, cerebellar and sham. The effect of tDCS on postural control was assessed using a sway-referencing paradigm, which induced platform rotations in proportion to the participant's body sway, thus assessing sensory reweighting processes. Task difficulty was manipulated so that young adults experienced a support surface that was twice as compliant as that of older adults, in order to minimise baseline age differences in postural sway. Effects of tDCS on postural control were assessed during, immediately after and 30 minutes after tDCS. Additionally, the effect of tDCS on corticospinal excitability was measured by evaluating motor evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation immediately after and 30 minutes after tDCS. Minimal effects of tDCS on postural control were found in the eyes open condition only, and this was dependent on the measure assessed and age group. For young adults, stimulation had only offline effects, as cerebellar stimulation showed higher mean power frequency (MPF) of sway 30 minutes after stimulation. For older adults, both stimulation conditions delayed the increase in sway amplitude witnessed between blocks one and two until stimulation was no longer active. In conclusion, despite tDCS' growing popularity, we would caution researchers to consider carefully the type of measures assessed and the groups targeted in tDCS studies of postural control.
我们研究了使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)刺激小脑和初级运动皮层(M1)是否会影响年轻人和老年人的姿势控制。tDCS采用双盲、假刺激对照设计,其中对年轻人(18 - 35岁)和老年人(65岁以上)进行了三个阶段的评估,每个刺激条件(M1、小脑和假刺激)各一个阶段。使用一种摇摆参照范式评估tDCS对姿势控制的影响,该范式会根据参与者的身体摇摆按比例诱导平台旋转,从而评估感觉重加权过程。通过调整任务难度,使年轻人体验到的支撑面顺应性是老年人的两倍,以尽量减少姿势摇摆的基线年龄差异。在tDCS期间、tDCS刚结束后以及tDCS结束30分钟后评估tDCS对姿势控制的影响。此外,通过在tDCS刚结束后和结束30分钟后使用经颅磁刺激评估运动诱发电位,来测量tDCS对皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响。仅在睁眼条件下发现tDCS对姿势控制的影响极小,且这取决于所评估的指标和年龄组。对于年轻人,刺激仅产生离线效应,因为小脑刺激在刺激后30分钟显示出更高的摇摆平均功率频率(MPF)。对于老年人,两种刺激条件都延迟了在第一和第二个时间段之间观察到的摇摆幅度增加,直到刺激不再起作用。总之,尽管tDCS越来越受欢迎,但我们提醒研究人员在姿势控制的tDCS研究中要仔细考虑所评估的指标类型和目标群体。