• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨全剂量与放射治疗新辅助联合治疗胆管癌患者临床疗效的回顾性分析

A retrospective analysis of the clinical effects of neoadjuvant combination therapy with full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy in patients with biliary tract cancer.

作者信息

Kobayashi S, Tomokuni A, Gotoh K, Takahashi H, Akita H, Marubashi S, Yamada T, Teshima T, Fukui K, Fujiwara Y, Sakon M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.008
PMID:28100416
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate survival and the objective response to neoadjuvant combination therapy with gemcitabine and radiation therapy in patients with biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

The chemoradiation therapy regimen consisted of 3 cycles of full-dose gemcitabine (1000 mg/m at days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) with 50-60 Gy radiation. We compared 27 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and 79 patients who were treated without neoadjuvant therapy. Hemi-hepatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy was planned for all of the patients in the study population. CT-based staging was used to adjust for the pre-treatment characteristics of the patients.

RESULTS

After confirming the reproducibility of CT-based staging, we analyzed the survival of the patients. The multivariate analysis showed that the absence of arterial invasion on CT, the absence of lymph node swelling, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors. The three-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in patients treated with and without neoadjuvant therapy were 78% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.0263). The adjusted overall survival (OS) (determined by the inverse probability of treatment weighting method using the inverse propensity score) was improved by neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.00187); the hazard ratio was 0.3505.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy might have the potential to improve RFS and OS.

REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR UMIN000015450.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估吉西他滨与放射治疗联合新辅助治疗对胆道癌患者的生存率及客观反应。

方法

放化疗方案包括3个周期的全剂量吉西他滨(每4周,第1、8和15天,1000mg/m)联合50 - 60Gy放射治疗。我们比较了27例接受新辅助放化疗的患者和79例未接受新辅助治疗的患者。研究人群中的所有患者均计划进行半肝切除术或胰十二指肠切除术。基于CT的分期用于调整患者的治疗前特征。

结果

在确认基于CT分期的可重复性后,我们分析了患者的生存率。多因素分析显示,CT上无动脉侵犯、无淋巴结肿大和新辅助治疗是独立的预后因素。接受和未接受新辅助治疗的患者三年无复发生存率(RFS)分别为78%和58%(P = 0.0263)。新辅助治疗改善了调整后的总生存率(OS)(通过使用逆倾向评分的治疗加权逆概率方法确定)(P = 0.00187);风险比为0.3505。

结论

新辅助放化疗可能具有改善RFS和OS的潜力。

注册信息

UMIN - CTR UMIN000015450

相似文献

1
A retrospective analysis of the clinical effects of neoadjuvant combination therapy with full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy in patients with biliary tract cancer.吉西他滨全剂量与放射治疗新辅助联合治疗胆管癌患者临床疗效的回顾性分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Radiotherapy or Chemoradiation in Unresectable Biliary Cancer: A Retrospective Study.不可切除胆管癌的放疗或放化疗:一项回顾性研究
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jun;39(6):3095-3100. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13445.
3
Evaluation of the safety and pathological effects of neoadjuvant full-dose gemcitabine combination radiation therapy in patients with biliary tract cancer.新辅助全剂量吉西他滨联合放射治疗对胆道癌患者的安全性及病理影响评估
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;76(6):1191-8. doi: 10.1007/s00280-015-2908-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
4
A phase II study of alternating cycles of split course radiation therapy and gemcitabine chemotherapy for inoperable pancreatic or biliary tract carcinoma.一项关于分割疗程放射治疗与吉西他滨化疗交替周期用于不可切除胰腺癌或胆管癌的II期研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun;28(3):234-41. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000156920.11091.12.
5
Adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with lymph node involvement: a propensity score matching analysis.吉西他滨辅助单药治疗可切除的伴淋巴结转移的肝门周围胆管癌:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Today. 2017 Feb;47(2):182-192. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1354-0. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Phase I trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with gemcitabine and surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma patients (NACRAC study).吉西他滨新辅助放化疗联合手术切除治疗胆管癌患者的I期试验(NACRAC研究)
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Nov-Dec;58(112):1866-72. doi: 10.5754/hge10106.
7
A pilot study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced biliary tract cancer.吉西他滨和顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期胆管癌的一项前瞻性研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;78(4):841-6. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3143-2. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Landmark survival analysis and impact of anatomic site of origin in prospective clinical trials of biliary tract cancer.在胆道癌前瞻性临床试验中,标志性生存分析及起源解剖部位的影响
J Hepatol. 2020 Nov;73(5):1109-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated chemoradiation and liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in Canada.加拿大针对不可切除的肝门部胆管癌采用新辅助超分割放化疗及肝移植治疗。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;117(2):213-219. doi: 10.1002/jso.24833.
10
Outcome of adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers.胆道癌辅助治疗的结果
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;38(4):382-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31829e19fb.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting resectability of biliary tract cancers, in the triplet drug therapy era with immune checkpoint inhibitors.在免疫检查点抑制剂三联药物治疗时代重新审视胆管癌的可切除性。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun;30(6):1060-1068. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02769-3. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Defining the Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancers: A Site-Specific Propensity-Matched Analysis.确定辅助放疗在胆管癌中的作用:一项基于特定部位倾向匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 2;17(3):494. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030494.
3
Design of studies on neoadjuvant therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
肝内胆管癌新辅助治疗的研究设计
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 25;11(2):e41356. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41356. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
4
Clinical evaluation and treatment outcomes of caustic ingestion injuries in Syrian pediatric patients: A retrospective study: Short title: High-dose steroids for pediatric caustic ingestions in Syria.叙利亚儿科患者腐蚀性物质摄入损伤的临床评估与治疗结果:一项回顾性研究:短标题:叙利亚儿科腐蚀性物质摄入的大剂量类固醇治疗
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar 14;12:20503121241234301. doi: 10.1177/20503121241234301. eCollection 2024.
5
Impact of Tumor Shrinkage Pattern with Biweekly Triplet Gemcitabine+Cisplatin+S-1 Regimen for Biliary Tract Cancers: Implications for Neoadjuvant Therapy from the Data of KHBO1401 (KHBO1401-1A Study).吉西他滨+顺铂+替吉奥双联方案治疗胆道癌的肿瘤退缩模式的影响:来自 KHBO1401(KHBO1401-1A 研究)数据的新辅助治疗意义。
Oncology. 2024;102(6):447-456. doi: 10.1159/000533669. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
6
Validation study for prognostic scoring system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery using preoperative factors.术前因素用于肝门周围胆管癌手术预后评分系统的验证研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 8;408(1):430. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03145-3.
7
A Practical Guide for the Systemic Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer in Canada.加拿大胆道癌系统治疗实用指南。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;30(8):7132-7150. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080517.
8
SPARC accelerates biliary tract cancer progression through CTGF-mediated tumor-stroma interactions: SPARC as a prognostic marker of survival after neoadjuvant therapy.富含半胱氨酸的酸性分泌蛋白通过 CTGF 介导的肿瘤-基质相互作用促进胆道癌的进展:富含半胱氨酸的酸性分泌蛋白作为新辅助治疗后生存的预后标志物。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10935-10950. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04835-7. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
9
Imaging features based on CT and MRI for predicting prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center study and meta-analysis.基于 CT 和 MRI 的影像学特征预测肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的单中心研究和荟萃分析。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00576-5.
10
Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助化疗后手术与直接手术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02754-y.