Suppr超能文献

抗生素涂层缝线对腹部伤口手术部位感染发生率的影响:一项荟萃分析。

The Effect of Antibiotic-Coated Sutures on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Abdominal Closures: a Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Elsolh Basheer, Zhang Lisa, Patel Sunil V

机构信息

Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Department of Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Burr 2, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):896-903. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3357-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to determine if antibiotic-impregnated sutures for abdominal fascial closure prevent postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs), hernias, and/or dehiscence.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (1946-2016) were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing antibiotic-impregnated sutures to standard sutures for abdominal closure were eligible. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbooks definitions.

RESULTS

Four-hundred fifty articles were reviewed; five eligible studies (N = 3117) were identified. All studies routinely used prophylactic antibiotics. Overall risk of SSI in the antibiotic-impregnated suture group was 10.4 vs. 13.0% in the control group. Pooled data showed no difference in SSI between suture types (odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.09, P = 0.15, I  = 44%). There was no evidence of subgroup effect by suture material (polydioxanone vs. polyglactin 910; P = 0.19) or by comparing colorectal surgery studies to others (P = 0.67). There was a high risk of bias in two studies, one for high loss to follow-up and one for not using an intent-to-treat analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis is the most comprehensive review on the utility of antibiotic-impregnated sutures in abdominal surgery to prevent SSI. We found no evidence to support routine use of these sutures.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在确定用于腹部筋膜缝合的含抗生素缝线能否预防术后手术部位感染(SSI)、疝气和/或伤口裂开。

方法

检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库(1946年至2016年)。比较含抗生素缝线与标准缝线用于腹部闭合的随机对照试验符合要求。使用Cochrane手册定义评估偏倚风险。

结果

共检索到450篇文章;确定了5项符合条件的研究(N = 3117)。所有研究均常规使用预防性抗生素。含抗生素缝线组的总体SSI风险为10.4%,而对照组为13.0%。汇总数据显示,不同缝线类型之间的SSI无差异(优势比0.79,95%可信区间0.57 - 1.09,P = 0.15,I² = 44%)。没有证据表明缝线材料(聚二氧六环酮与聚乙醇酸910;P = 0.19)或比较结直肠手术研究与其他研究(P = 0.67)存在亚组效应。两项研究存在高偏倚风险,一项是随访失访率高,另一项是未使用意向性分析。

结论

我们的荟萃分析是关于含抗生素缝线在腹部手术中预防SSI效用的最全面综述。我们没有发现支持常规使用这些缝线的证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验