ter Horst G, Hammann-Konings G M, van Hegten M J, Maritz B M, Meijer K L, Meyland Y M, van der Waag C
Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Public Health Dent. 1989 Fall;49(4):201-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1989.tb02069.x.
In March 1988 all Amsterdam dentists (N = 470) were sent a questionnaire to assess the extent of compliance with guidelines from the Health Council to prevent HIV transmission in dental practice. Response rate was 62 percent. Gloves, masks, and other protective garments were widely used. Other infection control procedures, like sterilizing instruments, were often not followed in ways recommended by the Health Council. To date, 60 percent of the respondents did not spend more than US$2,500 for protective garments or special equipment. Planned expenditure is substantially higher. One-quarter of the respondents were certain to have one or more HIV-seropositive patients, and 35 percent believed they did. When taking the medical history, almost one-third of the dentists ask questions to assess whether a patient is possibly HIV seropositive. Forty percent of the dentists hold the opinion that it is necessary for a dentist to know whether a patient is HIV seropositive. This is against Health Council views. Thirty percent of the respondents are definitely fearful of AIDS infection and want additional information or training on this topic.
1988年3月,向阿姆斯特丹所有牙医(共470人)发放了一份调查问卷,以评估他们在牙科诊疗中遵守卫生委员会预防艾滋病毒传播指南的程度。回复率为62%。手套、口罩和其他防护服被广泛使用。其他感染控制程序,如对器械进行消毒,往往未按照卫生委员会建议的方式执行。到目前为止,60%的受访者在防护服或特殊设备上的花费不超过2500美元。计划支出要高得多。四分之一的受访者确定有一名或多名艾滋病毒血清反应呈阳性的患者,35%的受访者认为他们有。在询问病史时,近三分之一的牙医会询问问题以评估患者是否可能艾滋病毒血清反应呈阳性。40%的牙医认为牙医有必要知道患者是否艾滋病毒血清反应呈阳性。这与卫生委员会的观点相悖。30%的受访者绝对害怕感染艾滋病,希望获得有关该主题的更多信息或培训。