Suppr超能文献

使理论明晰化——对医学教育研究者如何描述其与理论的联系的分析。

Making theory explicit - An analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory.

作者信息

Bolander Laksov Klara, Dornan Tim, Teunissen Pim W

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Education, Centre for the Advancement of University Teaching, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0848-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As medical education develops into a varied and well-developed field of research, the issue of quality research anchored in or generating theory has gained increasing importance. Medical education researchers have been criticized of not connecting their work to relevant theory. This paper set out to analyse how researchers can connect to theory in medical education. The goal of this paper is to provide an accessible framework for those entering medical education research, regarding how theory may become an integral part of one's work.

METHODS

Fifteen purposefully selected researchers in medical education were asked to nominate papers they considered influential in medical education. Through this process 41 papers were identified and included in the study.

RESULTS

The papers were analysed with thematic content analysis, which resulted in three approaches to the use of theory: as close-up exploration; as a specific perspective; and as an overview. The approaches are exemplified by quotes from the papers included in our dataset and further illuminated by a metaphoric story.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude by pointing at the importance of making explicit how theory is used in medical education as a way to collaboratively take responsibility for the quality of medical education research.

摘要

背景

随着医学教育发展成为一个多样化且成熟的研究领域,以理论为基础或产生理论的高质量研究问题变得越来越重要。医学教育研究人员因未将其工作与相关理论联系起来而受到批评。本文旨在分析研究人员如何在医学教育中与理论建立联系。本文的目的是为那些进入医学教育研究领域的人提供一个易于理解的框架,说明理论如何成为其工作的一个组成部分。

方法

15名经过有目的挑选的医学教育研究人员被要求提名他们认为在医学教育中有影响力的论文。通过这个过程,确定了41篇论文并纳入研究。

结果

采用主题内容分析法对这些论文进行分析,得出了三种理论运用方法:作为近距离探索;作为一种特定视角;作为一种概述。这些方法通过我们数据集中所包含论文的引述加以例证,并通过一个隐喻故事进一步阐释。

结论

我们指出明确说明理论在医学教育中的运用方式对于共同承担医学教育研究质量责任的重要性,以此作为结论。

相似文献

2
Review article: medical education research: an overview of methods.
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;59(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9635-y. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Making sense of grounded theory in medical education.
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02378.x.
4
Working with words: exploring textual analysis in medical education research.
Med Educ. 2012 Apr;46(4):372-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04184.x.
5
Review article: new directions in medical education related to anesthesiology and perioperative medicine.
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;59(2):136-50. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9633-0. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
6
Theory, a lost character? As presented in general practice education research papers.
Med Educ. 2019 May;53(5):443-457. doi: 10.1111/medu.13793. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Learning theory and its application to the use of social media in medical education.
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct;91(1080):556-60. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133358. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
The views of medical education stakeholders on guidelines for cultural diversity teaching.
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):e41-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590601034670.
10
Collaborative research in medical education: a discussion of theory and practice.
Med Educ. 2010 Dec;44(12):1175-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03768.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

3
Using theoretical engagement to understand workplace learning across contexts-Bringing worlds apart together.
Med Educ. 2025 Jan;59(1):65-74. doi: 10.1111/medu.15481. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
API integration and organisational agility outcomes in digital music platforms: A qualitative case study.
Heliyon. 2024 May 23;10(11):e31756. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31756. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
A qualitative study of social accountability translation: from mission to living it.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05093-y.
8
Developing a Center for Education Research and Scholarship in a Department of Pediatrics.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Aug 27;9:181. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000181.1. eCollection 2020.
9
Using a theoretical framework to develop postgraduate health professions education research and practice.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Apr 27;9:78. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000078.1. eCollection 2020.
10
Applying Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks to Health Professions Education Research: An Introductory Workshop.
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Dec 2;18:11286. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11286. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Theory development and application in medical education.
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S75-80. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842907.
2
The practicality of theory.
Acad Med. 2013 Nov;88(11):1594-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a66321.
3
Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education.
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):25-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318238e069.
4
'The research compass': an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56.
Med Teach. 2011;33(9):695-709. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595436.
5
Making sense of differences between medical schools through Bourdieu's concept of 'field'.
Med Educ. 2010 Jul;44(7):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03680.x.
6
On the transfer of theory to the practice of research and education.
Med Educ. 2010 Jun;44(6):534-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03637.x.
7
Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify.
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):312-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x.
8
Why use theories in qualitative research?
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a949.
9
Moving the field forward: going beyond quantitative-qualitative.
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S126-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e661d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验